The most important aim of science ought to be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a view that the most significant objective of science should be to enhance the life quality for ordinary people. I wholeheartedly deem it the same way as strides behind scientific breakthroughs are often made purely for the sake of better human welfare.
One reason why improving average individuals’ live should be the top priority of science lies in its ability to transform lifestyles in ways never heard of before. Take cutting-edge technologies everyday people use as a pertinent example. Once reserved for people with deep pockets, such technologies as smartphones, computers, washing machines, fridges and the like have recently hit the mainstream all because of relentless scientific endeavors. The devices listed above have reduced human labor, revolutionized communication and boosted living standards for people from different backgrounds, justifying the notion that the field of science should meet individual expectations whenever possible.
More than just facilitating the physical aspects of our lives, science, as a multifaceted branch of knowledge, can encompass medicine, which can be leveraged to provide people with better health outcomes. The instances of the deadliest diseases like malaria have been reduced considerably since medical advancements took place in the last century. These ailments used to claim millions of lives, and it was not until researchers and health experts came together to work out the solution and invented vaccines against such life-threatening illnesses. Cases like this reinforce the integral role of science in making life easier for individuals, and it is extraordinarily commendable.
In conclusion, the main purpose of scientific attempts should be to promote better living conditions, as has often, if not always, been the case.
The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion are clearly structured. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. There is a good use of less common and idiomatic vocabulary. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.
The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. There are few grammatical errors, but they do not impede communication.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The arguments are well-developed and supported with relevant examples. However, the introduction could be more engaging and the conclusion could be more comprehensive.
Suggestions
- Consider revising the introduction to make it more engaging and the conclusion to make it more comprehensive.