Some people think it is better for one single legal system throughout the world. Other say countries should have their own law. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There is an ensuing debate regarding whether countries should adopt a universal legal system or maintain their distinct laws. While some advocate for a unified approach to law enforcement, I firmly believe that each country should have its own constitution to account for its diverse population and unique lifestyle.
Some people argue that establishing a unified legal system would bring significant benefits, particularly for pioneers and immigrants. Many of them often struggle to adapt to a new environment and are unfamiliar with the country’s laws. As a result, they may unintentionally break the law or commit offenses without realizing their actions are prohibited. By unifying under a single legal system, everyone would be aware of their rights and responsibilities, which could prevent misunderstandings and reduce conflicts involving foreigners.”
On the other hand , some prefer to have different law enforcements . Because, each country has a diverse population and their mindset differs from each other.In order to unife the whole nations into a single law system causes many disadvantages and misunderstandings.For instance, in India’s laws, eating cow’s meat and meat products are strictly forbidden, while the main sort of food in Uzbekistan is meat and it’s products.Thus, they may bring disagreements between two nations, even political conflicts.However, I staunchly embrace the idea of having own law enforcements. Because,from past periods to now, all countries ,empires though are small, or domain controlled their population with their law systems,that may help them to prosper and develop. Because, that action helps to provide justice to account for their lifestyle and mindsets.If we implement the unified system to every country, at least one or two countries reject it due to some not adjustable features and completely wrong amon people. That is why, countries should maintain their own law enforcements.
To sum up, although unifying into one law systems have advantages ,their drawbacks are by far the most , such as causing misunderstandings and even conflicts

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the progression of ideas a bit difficult to follow. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s opinion.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and clearly state your opinion.

The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary relevant to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices, which could be improved for greater clarity and precision.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. The essay contains a number of grammatical errors, including issues with punctuation, subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure. Some sentences are also overly complex or awkward, which can make them difficult to understand. Simplifying these sentences and focusing on accurate grammar and punctuation will help improve the overall clarity and readability of the essay.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the arguments for and against a universal legal system and clearly stating the writer’s opinion. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples to support the arguments and by offering a more detailed exploration of the topic. The conclusion could also be strengthened by summarizing the main points and clearly restating the writer’s position.