Some people believe that spending time in nature has significant benefits for mental and physical health. Others think that urban lifestyles and technology have made spending time in nature unnecessary. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There is an assumption that allocating time in nature enhances both mental and physical health, whereas some people oppose this belief for urban life and technology distractions. I firmly believe that interacting with nature allows us to release stress and increase our productivity.When we are focused on our way, nothing disturbs us, be it bustling urban life or gadgets.
One of the main benefits of spending time in nature is relieving stress and tensions. This is because gazing around at nature’s beauty, from pure sky to blossoming trees, distracts temporarily and helps forget to problems. If spend your time for a long time, we will immerse in another world, where everything is quiet, with no noise and just a tranquil atmosphere to relax. However, it also enables us to reap double profits. When we do different activities, such as homework and projects, we may not be disturbed by annoying siblings; no distractions may be involved there. With just nature is continuing its daily rhythm, with birds singing and apparent movements of all flora and fauna towards development. Thus, we spend time effectively, and it requires less time than doing at home due to a calm an peaceful environment.
However, there may be some drawbacks. One of the main disturbances is technology, gadgets such as phones and laptops we use every day. Whether we want to or not, it is impossible to imagine yourself without them and always go everywhere with phones or a particular technology. While we are adapting to that environment, if someone calls you or notifications make sound, we will be distracted. As a result, it becomes difficult to concentrate on. Additionally, urban lifestyle can prevent us from sparing time beneficially. Because, in this fast-paced world, everyone is rushing, car drivers cannot wait for a moment and honk consistently to pass from crowded places or traffic lights. As a result, it may be a barrier to interacting with nature; while you are listening to noise and horns, you cannot be content or concentrated enough to do that.
To sum up, the time spent in nature is useful to get rid of bad feelings and enhance productivity skills. When we are intending to engage in sports or tasks, it is better to leave gadgets and, as possible, go remote, but green places

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the progression of ideas a bit difficult to follow. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the writer’s stance.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to link all the ideas in a paragraph to the main point of the paragraph.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical resource. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical resource, with a variety of vocabulary used effectively to convey the intended meaning. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and a variety of grammatical structures. However, there are several grammatical errors that can be distracting for the reader. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures and shows an adequate control of grammar and punctuation. However, there are some grammatical errors and awkward constructions that can be distracting for the reader and should be addressed for overall clarity and coherence.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position and supporting it with relevant examples. However, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the writer’s stance.