Children should be taught how to think critically rather than memorizing facts in school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people say that it is better for school children to learn to think critically instead of learning facts by heart. I totally agree with this statement, and this essay will argue the reasons why.
School is the foundation of all knowledge that is gained throughout the life of people. Therefore, all the subjects which are taught at school should be practical and should help children solve problems later in life. It is worth mentioning that school is not a place where robots are generated with tons of data loaded which is unable to think and adapt to the sudden changes of life. Unlike robots, humans must know how to assess the situation and make conscious decisions accordingly.
Definitely, this process should start from early ages, and of course, school plays an important role in this. In order to implement this, school curriculums must include classes in which students can independently think and evaluate certain topics. As a consequence, Generation Z, unlike other generations, will grow up to be more sensible and tactful.
Additionally, memorized information is easy to forget and context-based. When children consume a lot of data at once, for example, years and names of people, it can cause brain dysfunctions. The thing is, the brain is like a storage system—the more data loaded, the more earlier ones start fading away. Although it is believed that young children are better at memorizing facts than adults, it does not mean that they can be pressured to memorize all data from different subjects.
Furthermore, I should mention the context-based side of the facts and knowledge when it is memorized. I mean, children, whenever they memorize certain facts or data, they cannot use it flexibly in other contexts or different situations. For instance, history lessons shed light on this matter. In a typical history class, children learn when and where certain wars happened instead of understanding and thinking about what were the reasons and consequences of them. In my opinion, rather than memorizing facts about historical events, children should discuss and think critically about their consequences and learn lessons from them.
In conclusion, children should be trained to think critically because they need to use their knowledge in life and should not be like machines. As for the better future of young students, schools should teach critical thinking skills. In order to reach it, lessons at schools should be discussed and assessed by children independently
The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion are clearly identifiable. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs that each discuss a different aspect of the issue, and a conclusion that restates the main argument. Transitions between ideas are smooth, and the essay overall demonstrates good coherence. However, the cohesion could be improved by more explicitly linking the main points back to the thesis statement in the conclusion.
Suggestions
- Try to ensure that your ideas flow more smoothly from one to the next.
The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a range of vocabulary, with appropriate use of academic language. However, there are a few instances where word choice could be improved for clarity and precision.
The essay demonstrates a good range of grammatical structures and is mostly accurate. However, there are a few minor errors that could be improved. The essay demonstrates a good command of a range of grammatical structures, with a variety of sentence types used effectively. However, there are a few minor errors that could be corrected for improved clarity and accuracy.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position and supporting it with relevant examples. The essay effectively addresses the prompt, presenting a clear position that critical thinking skills are more valuable than memorizing facts in school. The writer provides a well-structured argument with a clear introduction, body paragraphs that each discuss a different aspect of the issue, and a conclusion that restates the main argument. The position is supported with relevant examples and explanations that demonstrate a deep understanding of the issue. However, the argument could be further strengthened by more explicitly linking the main points back to the thesis statement in the conclusion.
Suggestions
- Consider more explicitly linking the main points back to the thesis statement in the conclusion to strengthen the overall argument.