Some people think that current environmental issues are global problems and should therefore be dealt with by the government while others believe that these problems can only be tackled by individuals. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

There is a debate over who should be responsible for dealing with the existing environmental concerns, with some saying it is the government’s duty to confront these global problems and others arguing that individuals should bear the responsibility. In my opinion, the latter view seems more accurate as people’s collective actions significantly impact the environment.
Governments are regarded to be accountable for addressing environmental issues. This is because they are able to enforce regulations that control pollution, protect natural resources, and encourage sustainable practices. These regulations can be included special programs such as tree planting, street cleaning or implementing car-free weeks to encourage individuals to reduce environmental harm. To ensure compliance, the government is believed to impose fine on those citizens who disregard the rules, reinforcing the importance of environmental stewardship.
However, I believe the private sector should take responsibility for addressing environmental problems. Every individual makes daily decisions that can either harm or benefit the environment. This does not mean people must completely stop using electricity, motorized transport, or plastic products, but they can at least minimize their usage to reduce their negative impact. Governments, on the other hand, may find it challenging to monitor every citizen who refuses to participate in such programs, potentially leading to widespread neglect. Therefore, if each person takes partial responsibility for protecting the environment, there is a strong likelihood of achieving faster and more effective progress.
Teaching people to love the nature from the childhood is better. Older generation, including school representatives or parents, should teach the significance of the environment to younger generations and instill environmental awareness. From the young age, children can be easily guided to adopt eco-friendly actions like disposing the litter properly, respecting the plants or conserving water. By instilling these values early, children are more likely to grow up with a deep respect for nature and a sense of responsibility toward protecting it rather than enforce them in an older age.
In conclusion, the government can influence the people by taking proper actions towards environmental issues. That said, individuals hold more accountability when it comes to environmental challenges by altering their daily habits and implementing these habits from a young age.

7.5

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved.

“Teaching people to love the nature from the childhood is better.” – The preposition usage is incorrect here. It should be “from childhood.”
“Older generation, including school representatives or parents, should teach the significance of the environment to younger generations…” – This sentence is a bit long and could be made more concise for clarity.

Suggestions

Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
Ensure that your sentences are clear and concise to improve the overall coherence of the essay.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. A variety of vocabulary is used, including less common and idiomatic expressions. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.

“This does not mean people must completely stop using electricity, motorized transport, or plastic products, but they can at least minimize their usage to reduce their negative impact.” – The word “minimize” is not the most appropriate in this context. A better choice might be “reduce.”
“Governments, on the other hand, may find it challenging to monitor every citizen who refuses to participate in such programs, potentially leading to widespread neglect.” – The word “neglect” is not the most appropriate in this context. A better choice might be “oversight.”

The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. The majority of sentences are error-free, and punctuation is well managed. However, there are a few minor errors.

“Every individual makes daily decisions that can either harm or benefit the environment.” – The verb tenses are not consistent. A better version would be, “Every individual makes daily decisions that can either harm or benefit the environment.”
“Governments, on the other hand, may find it challenging to monitor every citizen who refuses to participate in such programs, potentially leading to widespread neglect.” – The verb tenses are not consistent. A better version would be, “Governments, on the other hand, may find it challenging to monitor every citizen who refuses to participate in such programs, which could lead to widespread neglect.”

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. Both sides of the argument are discussed in a balanced way, and the writer’s opinion is clearly stated and supported. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples to support the arguments. The essay could be enhanced by providing more specific examples to support the arguments. For instance, the discussion on government accountability could be strengthened by including examples of specific regulations or programs that have been successful in reducing environmental harm. Similarly, the argument on individual responsibility could be supported with examples of specific actions that individuals can take to reduce their environmental impact.