Housing is a basic necessity for everyone. Therefore, government should provide free housing for people who cannot afford to pay it.
Owning a house to live in is a vital requirement so free housing should be given by governments to those who are unable to buy it. I completely disagree with this statement and think that it would place an immense financial burden on the government and demotivate individual responsibility.
First of all, providing free accommodation to people who cannot buy it themselves would put on strain on government financial resources. In other words, governments need a substantial amount of money for the most essential fields like healthcare, education and defence. So, governments have to divert resources from the important areas so that they can construct free houses. Moreover, some governments have to increase taxes that their citizens pay to cover construction expenses. As a result, residents suffer disproportionately due to a lack of quality services and the high tax burden.
Furthermore free housing might discourage people from driving for financial independence and self-sufficiency. This is because this government aid would increase dependency among recipients and reduce incentive to work, as a result, these people tend to feel unwilling to seek jobs to be financially secure to support themselves. In addition, the unemployment rate is also likely to rise due to relying on welfare reducing productivity in all spheres. Consequently, the economy of those countries which allocate money to the construction of free houses will deteriorate if there is a reduction in the number of people who can contribute to the government by working in various fields.
In conclusion, people will strain government budgets and stop making an effort to earn if they receive houses from governments for free. Thus, I am against the idea of the government offering free accommodations to those who do not have their own ones.
The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion are clearly structured. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
- Ensure that your sentences are not too long or complex, as this can sometimes make your argument less clear.
The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.
The essay demonstrates a good control of a range of grammatical structures, with only minor errors. However, there are a few sentences that could be improved for clarity.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The arguments are well-developed and supported with relevant examples. However, the introduction could be more engaging to the reader.
Suggestions
- Consider using a more engaging hook in your introduction to capture the reader’s attention.
- Provide more specific examples to support your arguments.