Skip to main content

people who decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The debate over whether it is more beneficial to change jobs frequently or if one can gain more benefits by staying in the same job has been contentious. In this regard, there is a view that people falling into the latter tend to lead a more satisfactory professional life than those into the former. I do not necessarily agree with the given perspective, as both decisions have their own merits that offer job satisfaction.
Some people favor keeping their job until retirement for several reasons, one of which is reduced stress. Working for the same company for many years gives a competitive edge for employees in the form of a secure job. This is because they have already shown loyalty through years of working despite difficulties they faced during their career. Such workers are, for the most part, away from job displacement, allowing them to live a stress-free life. Promotion opportunities are another factor that contributes partly to employee retention. Experienced and competent employees who are often individuals working for many years, have the potential to climb the career ladder; they can be promoted to higher positions or over time, paid more than before. These are just two benefits to having a lifetime job that are enough to guarantee a satisfying working life.
Nevertheless, job-hopping also brings significant advantages. This decision is made mainly by people whose top priority is not directly related to money but satisfaction in life. In other words, they switch to a different job to challenge themselves against like-minded individuals- meaning that personal growth might matter most for them. For example, pursuing a career in an area surrounded by professionals gives them a chance to work together and therefore expose themselves to different fresh perspectives. Coupled with challenges in adapting to a new job environment, they would start growing individually, helping them become a well-rounded individual. Furthermore, some make multiple job shifts in an attempt to earn more. Having gained experience in one company, their chance of making more money in another one is higher. This can grant them with financial freedom that contributes to their contentment to a greater extent after affording a lifestyle of their choice.
In conclusion, through pursuing the same career in life can one stay away from stress caused by job displacement and get promotions. Meanwhile, those trying multiple jobs over the course of their working life can enjoy greater self-growth and earning power. Therefore, it is not right to make either decision seem more satisfactory over one another.

8.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs that each discuss a different perspective, and a conclusion that effectively summarizes the main points. You use a range of cohesive devices effectively (“Nevertheless,” “For example,” “In other words”), which helps to guide the reader through your argument. To improve cohesion, consider more explicitly linking the two main bodies of your essay to highlight the overall balance you are trying to achieve between stability and change.

Suggestions
  • Try to use a wider range of linking words to improve the flow of ideas.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. You demonstrate a good command of vocabulary, with a variety of terms related to career development and job satisfaction (“job displacement,” “promotion opportunities,” “personal growth”). Your use of terminology is generally appropriate and contributes to a clear and formal style. To further enhance your lexical resource, consider the use of more varied and precise language to describe the benefits and drawbacks of each approach to career development.

The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. There are a few minor errors, but they do not impede communication. Your essay displays a good command of a range of grammatical structures, with only minor errors. The variety of sentence structures you use helps to maintain the reader’s interest and demonstrates your grammatical proficiency. To further improve, pay attention to the consistency of verb tenses and ensure that your sentences are clear and unambiguous.

The essay addresses the task fully and presents a well-developed response. The writer’s position is clear throughout the essay. You have addressed the task effectively by presenting a clear position that both staying in the same job and changing jobs can lead to a satisfying working life. Your introduction sets up the debate well, and you provide a balanced discussion of the advantages of each approach. Your conclusion effectively summarizes your main points and reiterates your position. To further enhance your task response, consider providing more specific examples to support your arguments and make your position even more persuasive.

Suggestions
  • Consider providing more specific examples to support your arguments.