In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which do you think is appropriate in today’s world?
While some countries strongly support the opinion that secondary school should supply a general education, there are others who think specialized programs play crusial role in children’s specific careers. Although, there are some strong arguments on both of these sides, I would side with the former group for people for some reasons such as holistic development and flexibility.
One the one hand, focusing on only majoring subjects can enhances practical skills which might be required in their future career. As researching too many domains can be stressful for the students, especially for those who face challenge, leading students can be detrimental to in their not only future career, but also goals. Thus, schools take steps and measures to focus on specialized subjects. For example, according to recent research, students learning syllabus disciplines can achieve the success more than studying all the domain. Therefore, to pass an exam in their life with flying colours, students are supposed to learn a mere subjects.
That said, a general education exposes students to a wide range of subjects, fostering critical thinking, creativity and adaptability. It is undeniable that this broad knowledge base can help students develop a well-rounded perspective on the world. Namely, thanks to a multidisciplinary education in Uzbekistan, students can adapt as needed, providing them with skills that are transferable across various fields. Hence, learning the ropes of core education which would
hopefully them allow them to engage in throughtfully in society.
In conclusion, studying both the general studies and a narrow range of subjects respectively may be the most appropriate. I believe that a general education far outshine for students enables to learn lifelong
and adapt in an ever-changing world.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s position.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to fully develop your ideas in each paragraph.
The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical resource. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are only minor errors. However, there are some errors in article and preposition usage, as well as some awkward phrasings that could be revised for clarity. The essay demonstrates a good control of a range of grammatical structures, with only minor errors. However, there are some errors in article and preposition usage, as well as some awkward phrasings that could be revised for clarity.
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay could also benefit from a more detailed exploration of the counter-argument.
Suggestions
- Ensure that you fully develop your argument and support it with specific examples.
- Consider addressing potential counter-arguments to make your position more persuasive.