Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree.
There is a debate over whether a country can keep the environment clean at the same time being economically successful or not with some people saying that it is impossible and others arguing that it can be achieved. In my opinion, while it may seem to be hard to achieve due to some reasons, balance between economic success and lush environment is still highly likely to be built with the help of eco-tourism and green-technology.
There are several reasons why a country cannot have both economic success and pure ecosystem. Fast-paced industrialization can be the one factor. It is true that multiple countries, such as china and India, focuses on futuristic city structure to attract more tourists where green-spaces have to be cut down to replace the area with skyscrapers or other modern buildings. Construction costs are lower than installation of green technology. Take, for example, specialized filters for factories that do not let any carbon emissions spread to the atmosphere. Per such effective filter costs around 15 million dollars to install while for that amount of money, infrastructure may be developed or all-inclusive hotel can be built that attract far more tourists.
However, investment in eco-technology can be profitable in the long run even though installing requires great amount of money. If cities use renewable energy instead of fossil fuels, like natural gas, coal, there is no need to import them, and thus they would leave with extra money to invest in more advancements that lead to economic growth. Even they can export sustainable energy to other countries with lack of natural resources to use, growing overall country revenue.
Another reason why it is possible to be economically successful country coupled with eco-friendly, is that, nowadays, people are more keen to visit to countries with greenery for health benefits and other. Such countries offer lushness and fresh air which means that people with respiratory problems prefer using medical services there rather than compared to air-polluted cities. In addition, recycling can save up some money rather than reproducing products, spending additional materials and extra labor. In Japan, local residents make money from selling recycled items such as clothes that are sewn by waste. Countries would boost their income in case they implement selling local produce in main tourist attractions.
In conclusion, maintaining economic success followed by clean less of the city may seem unlikely since operating city to preserve both costs so high and industrialization. That said, this balance is possible by shifting to green technology and supporting eco-tourism.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. Clearer topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph and more explicit linking phrases would help guide the reader through the essay. Ensuring consistent punctuation and spacing will also improve readability.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
- Ensure that your arguments flow logically from one to the next.
The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, but there are some instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. For example, “pure ecosystem” should be “pristine environment,” and “all-inclusive hotel can be built that attract far more tourists” should be “all-inclusive hotels can attract far more tourists.” Refining word choice and ensuring correct spelling and grammar usage will improve the overall clarity and professionalism of the essay.
The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay contains a few grammatical errors that affect clarity and readability. For example, “Construction costs are lower than installation of green technology” should be “Construction costs are lower than the installation of green technology,” and “Even they can export sustainable energy to other countries with lack of natural resources to use” should be “In addition, they could export sustainable energy to countries lacking natural resources.” Paying closer attention to grammatical accuracy, including correct verb forms and preposition usage, will improve the overall quality of the essay.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. However, the argument could be more fully developed in places. The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing the debate over whether a country can be both economically successful and environmentally clean. The writer presents a clear stance, arguing that it is possible to achieve a balance between the two through eco-tourism and green technology. The essay provides relevant examples to support the argument, but the discussion could be more fully developed in places. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.
Suggestions
- Ensure that you fully develop your arguments and provide sufficient support for your position.