Some people think technology development decreases crime, while others believe it actually encourages crime. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

There is a debate over how technology affects crime. While some believe it helps reduce crime, others think it promotes criminal activity. I agree with those who believe technology can reduce crime through tools like CCTV and DNA testing.
On the one hand, new technology can help criminals. Hackers use advanced computers to steal money or personal details. In 2020, Garmin was attacked by hackers who used ransomware and demanded $10 million to unlock data. This shows how technology can be misused. Social media can also influence young people negatively. Teenagers may be attracted to content promoting illegal activities or violence, which can lead to crime. This shows technology can have bad effects when used irresponsibly.
However, technology can also reduce crime. For example, CCTV cameras prevent crime by making people aware they are being watched. Areas with CCTV have fewer crimes. Another useful technology is DNA testing. It helps police find criminals and solve crimes more easily. For example, the police solved a 20-year-old case using DNA evidence. This shows how technology helps bring criminals to justice.
In conclusion, although technology can be misused, I believe its benefits far outweigh the negatives. Tools like CCTV and DNA testing are effective in reducing crime, making society safer.

7.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.

Suggestions

Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas.
Ensure that your examples are directly relevant to the point you are making.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.

The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. There are a few minor errors, but they do not impede communication.

The essay addresses the task fully and presents a clear position throughout the response. Both sides of the argument are discussed, and the writer’s opinion is clearly stated. However, the discussion could be more detailed and specific.