Housing is a basic necessity for everyone. Therefore, government should provide free housing for people who cannot afford to pay it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a view that housing is the main need for everyone.Some people believe that the government should provide for people who cannot pay for it.
One of the main problem is, if the government provides with free apartment,people can become lazy.The reason is that they do not want to work because they think that the government would provide with a lot of things by the end of the their life.For instance Greece’s economic crisis partly stemmed from excessive welfare programs.
On the other hand, providing with housing, people can get motivation for their children.As there are a lot of poor people who cannot pay for their children education,they may afford to pay it because they spend huge amount of money for housing and they may use it for education.For example everyone want to live in apartment fees and for this reason they try to earn money to buy it,if the government offer with free housing, they may use this money for kids tuition.
In conclusion while there is a problem with offering apartment,I strongly believe that it is better to provide with housing.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s position.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and clearly state your position.
The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, with some attempts to use less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices, which can detract from the overall clarity and effectiveness of the writing. Additionally, the essay sometimes repeats the same words or phrases, which can make the writing seem less varied and dynamic.
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. However, these errors do not generally impede communication. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, which adds some variety and interest to the writing. However, there are some grammatical errors and inaccuracies in punctuation and spelling, which can detract from the overall clarity and effectiveness of the writing. Additionally, the essay sometimes repeats the same ideas or phrases, which can make the writing seem less varied and dynamic.
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the potential implications of the government providing free housing to those in need. However, the argument is not fully developed, and the essay could benefit from a more thorough exploration of the potential benefits and drawbacks of such a policy. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s position.
Suggestions
- Ensure that you fully develop your argument and support it with specific examples.