As public safety is of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer than for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

There is a view that animals should be used to test new medicines or vacinations instead of risking human lives. Even though there can be some exceptions, I agree with the given statement.
As technologies are developing different new diseases are also arising. In order to make sure that medicines for them are practical health experts need to test them in real life. Before using them among people and putting patients under risk, it is better to use them on some animals like rats or cats. Only after proving that new pharmacy does not have any negative effects on human life, using them to cure should be allowed. Animals may have some rights, but still, it is logical that they can be used to avoid loss of human beings.
Technological advances have led to practise different new medicines on computer simulations. If it is possible, using animals to test any kind of medical invention may not seem reasonable. Furthermore, some testing might not be critical in terms of saving humanity. In those cases, not using animals to check the relaibility of the drugs may not seem practical. However, in case of epidemies or pandemics where human lives are lost, there should be discussion that either animals can be used to make sure new vacsinations are workable or not.
In conclusion, utilizing some animals to check new drugs may seem harsh, but if it is about providing public safety, there should not be any discussion.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the argument difficult to follow. Additionally, there are some issues with coherence, as the connection between ideas is not always clear. More explicit signposting language could help guide the reader through the essay and improve overall coherence.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make the connection between ideas more explicit to improve coherence.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary, with appropriate use of academic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and precision. Additionally, the use of more varied and sophisticated language could help to strengthen the essay.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are few grammatical errors. However, there are some errors in article and preposition usage that can be distracting. The essay demonstrates a good command of grammar and sentence structure, with a variety of sentence types used effectively. However, there are a few minor errors in grammar and punctuation that could be revised for clarity and accuracy. Additionally, the use of more complex grammatical structures could help to strengthen the essay.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay effectively addresses the prompt, presenting a clear position and supporting it with relevant examples. The argument is well-developed and the ideas are presented in a logical sequence, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, the conclusion could be more fully developed to provide a more comprehensive summary of the main points discussed.