Skip to main content

Many people argue that restaurants should be required to disclose the nutritional information of the dishes they serve.

Some people think that restaurants should be required to disclose the nutritional compasition of the food they cook. Despite it’s possible negatives.,I tend to see positived stemming from it are more significant.
Addmittedly in restaurants give should be give nutritional compasition of the food bring about with some problems one of which is people difficultly chance foods. In restaurents regular clients have their favorite food but restaurants them give nutritional compasition of clients may not like those foods or foods unhealthy and not rich nutrition.
However I think I restaurants give nutritional compasition of the foods can offer far more benefits, one of which is positive effect health. Clients can chance healthy food and if clients want to lose weight they order food delicious and has small calories. Other advantage is food allergies and sensitivities. Restaurants can provide information on allergies present in their dishes, helping customers with food allergies or intolerance choose safer options.
To conclude even though of the disadvantage economic factors and crisis, advantages with the health benefits and food allergies and sensitivities, which is enough for me to make sure the negative outweigh the positive.

4.5

The essay is somewhat organized and ideas are linked, but there are some issues with clarity and flow. The essay is structured with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, which aids in its overall coherence. However, the cohesion between ideas could be improved with more explicit linking phrases and a clearer progression of arguments. For example, the transition from discussing potential disadvantages to highlighting the benefits could be smoother to guide the reader more effectively through your argument. Additionally, ensuring that each paragraph focuses on a single main idea would help to reinforce the essay’s overall cohesion.

Suggestions
  • Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transitions between ideas.
  • Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central topic and that all sentences in the paragraph relate to this topic.

The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary and there is some evidence of less common and idiomatic language. You demonstrate a reasonable range of vocabulary relevant to the topic, such as “disclose,” “nutritional composition,” and “food allergies and sensitivities.” To further improve, consider diversifying your language to avoid repetition (e.g., using synonyms for “restaurants” like “establishments” or “dining venues”) and more precisely conveying your points. Additionally, be mindful of word choice to ensure clarity and accuracy (e.g., “chance” should be “change” in the context of altering food choices).

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are only minor errors. The essay features a variety of grammatical structures, but there are several errors that affect clarity and readability. Paying attention to article use, subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure will help improve the grammatical accuracy of your writing. For instance, “clients can chance healthy food” could be more accurately expressed as “clients can choose healthier food.”

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing both the disadvantages and advantages of requiring restaurants to disclose the nutritional information of their food. You present a clear stance supporting the disclosure, backed by arguments focusing on its potential to help customers make healthier choices and address food allergies. To enhance your response, consider providing more specific examples or data to support your claims and addressing potential counterarguments more thoroughly to strengthen your position.

Suggestions
  • Ensure that you fully develop your arguments and provide sufficient support for your position.
  • Consider addressing potential counterarguments to strengthen your position.