The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Australia. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart shows the percentage of people in Australia visiting four different places: the zoo, library, theatre, and cinema. The data is divided into three groups: those born in Australia, migrants from English-speaking countries, and migrants from non-English-speaking countries.
Overall, the cinema was the most popular place among all groups, while the theatre was the least visited. The library attracted a large number of non-English-speaking migrants, but it was not as popular among the other two groups.
Looking at the details, about 65% of Australians and English-speaking migrants went to the cinema, making it the most visited place. For non-English-speaking migrants, the cinema was slightly less popular, with just over 50% attending.
The zoo was visited by around 50% of Australians and migrants from English-speaking countries. However, only about 35% of non-English-speaking migrants went there, which was lower compared to the other two groups.
The library showed a different trend. It was visited by nearly 45% of non-English-speaking migrants, much higher than the 15% of Australians and 12% of English-speaking migrants who went there.
Theatre attendance was the lowest among all activities. Only about 20% of Australians and English-speaking migrants visited it, and the figure for non-English-speaking migrants was even lower, at just 10%.
The report is logically organized, with a clear structure that flows from general observations to specific details for each location. Transitions between points are smooth, contributing to a coherent narrative. The use of phrases like “Looking at the details” effectively signals a shift to more specific information, which helps maintain the flow of the report. The overall cohesion is strong, with a clear progression of ideas that enhances the readability of the report.
The vocabulary in the report is varied and appropriately academic, with terms like “attracted,” “visited,” “popularity,” and “comparing” used effectively to convey the necessary information. The language is precise and well-suited to the task, contributing to a strong lexical resource. There are no significant issues with word choice or expression, indicating a good command of the necessary vocabulary for this type of report.
The report demonstrates a wide range of grammatical structures used accurately to convey complex ideas. The use of varied sentence structures, including passive constructions and comparative sentences, is effective and shows a good control of grammar. There are no noticeable grammatical errors, indicating a high level of grammatical accuracy that supports the overall quality of the report.
The report successfully fulfills the task requirements by summarizing the main features of the data and making relevant comparisons. It clearly identifies the most and least visited places, as well as the differences in attendance based on the origin of the participants. The data is accurately represented with specific percentages, and the overall trends are well-highlighted. The report effectively communicates the essential information, meeting the requirements of the task.