Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

A monotonous lifestyle can be a preferred option for some individuals, while others believe that living the life that is full of occasional changes and new experiences is more beneficial to them. Although there are numerous advantages of both, i think that people should try to reach a certain balance.
Some people favor spending their days with sameness routine, its rudimentary reasons are comfort and security. To be specific, doing the same things allows individuals to reach stability and safety, and these are usually linked with predictable outcomes and fewer surprises, especially in turbulent times. Furthermore, those who live this way usually make fewer divisions and give less cognitive overload, allowing them to focus on meaningful aspects of life. This point can create a chance to build up a comfortable lifestyle without decision fatigue.
The majority of people react with dismay to the unchanging lifestyle, however. To avoid staying stuck in the same tendency, individuals embrace changes. In this way, they create a chance to fulfill their lives with a sense of satisfaction and happiness. It can also be more exciting since there are new opportunities and events taking place frequently, helping to push out from comfort zone and discover potential.
In my opinion, every individual should find their a proper balanced routine by coming from their standards and perspective. In some areas, being fully repetitive during a lengthy span may be an alternative way in a life, and in other areas, this is vice-versa. But making guidance with healthy habits and being open to future coming is key to avoiding the downsides of both monotonous and dynamic lifestyle while still reaping their benefits.
In summary, being welcomed to new experiences and staying monotony in life can be both rational, but i reckon balancing routine with their mix is more enjoyable.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the progression of ideas a bit difficult to follow. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the writer’s stance.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to fully develop your ideas in each paragraph.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, and the majority of sentences are free from grammatical errors. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect sentence construction that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position and supporting it with relevant examples. However, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the writer’s stance.