Skip to main content

Some people believe that technology can help to reduce crime rates while others feel that it has made possible to make more violations. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The role of technology in modern society is undeniable, and its influence on crime rates is a topic of significant debate. While some argue that technological advancements have been instrumental in reducing crime, others contend that these same innovations have enabled more sophisticated criminal activity. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my opinion.
On the one hand, proponents of technology argue that it serves as a powerful tool in crime prevention and apprehension. One of the most notable contributions is the widespread use of CCTV cameras, which act as both a deterrent and a source of evidence. Surveillance footage has been crucial in identifying suspects and tracking the movements of fugitives, significantly increasing the chances of solving crimes. Additionally, technologies like facial recognition and forensic analysis aid law enforcement in pinpointing serial offenders who might otherwise evade capture. For instance, cases of theft or vandalism often rely on digital trails, such as security recordings or data from smartphones, to secure convictions. Thus, technology enhances the ability to monitor, investigate, and reduce criminal activities.
On the other hand, critics believe that technological advancements have opened avenues for more sophisticated violations. Cybercrime, for example, has become a growing threat, ranging from identity theft to large-scale data breaches. Criminals exploit technological tools to perpetrate their offenses, often staying several steps ahead of law enforcement. Furthermore, the anonymity provided by the internet allows offenders to operate undetected for extended periods, making apprehension more challenging. Even physical crimes, such as burglaries, have been facilitated by technology, with offenders using information shared on social media platforms to target victims. These examples illustrate how technology, while beneficial in some respects, can also be weaponized by those with malicious intent.
In my opinion, although technology has undeniably facilitated certain types of crime, its potential to prevent and solve crimes far outweighs its drawbacks. The integration of technological tools into policing strategies not only aids in the identification of criminals but also fosters a sense of security among citizens. However, it is imperative that law enforcement agencies remain proactive in adapting to emerging technologies and addressing the loopholes that criminals might exploit. Greater emphasis on cybersecurity, public awareness, and international cooperation can further mitigate the risks posed by technological misuse.
In conclusion, while technology has indeed enabled some individuals to commit more advanced violations, its role in reducing crime rates and aiding in the apprehension of offenders cannot be overlooked. With proper regulation and continued innovation, technology is more likely to be a force for good in the fight against crime.

8.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.

Suggestions
  • Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas.
  • Ensure that your ideas are fully developed and explained.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.

The essay shows a good control of a range of grammatical structures, with only minor errors. However, there are a few sentences that could be rephrased for better clarity.

The essay addresses the task fully, presenting a clear position throughout the response. Both sides of the argument are discussed in detail, and the writer’s opinion is clearly stated and supported.