Housing is a basic necessity for everyone. Therefore, government should provide free housing for people who cannot afford to pay it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a view that government should provide free housing for individuals who afford to pay it. I agree to this view as there are countries where inflation is high, and providing houses for people can lead to social stability.
Inflation may be high in some countries. Most of local people might not be able to pay for the house. As their salaries increase, in many cases, the cost of other pays and itemas may also increase. As a result, individuals can afford only for living and daily consumption. Their children will grow and become adults, so the family should move to house, which is bigger and comfortable. However, there might not be enough money to buy it because the cost of house can be relatively high. Take my county – Uzbekistan. Loads of apartments have been built for last ten years. But only a small number of people can afford them.
Providing houses for individuals can result in social stability. In many countries, especially in African ones, the rate of crime is growing year by year. The reasons for this can be the lack of money, as well as irresponsibility of the government. Probably, there are a lot of people living on the streets, dumps, or in some kind of ruins in Africa. Providing houses or apartments for such people can contribute to the peace and development of the country. Furthermore, this can help individuals in the future, allowing them to allocate more to provide their houses with furniture, TV, and fridge, and anything that families need.
In conclusion, I believe governments should grant houses for those who cannot afford them because inflation might be high in some countries, and such actions can result in social stability in the country.
- C - undefined
- Cohesion And Coherence - 7.0
- Lexical Resource - 7.0
- Grammatical Range - 7.0
- Task Achievement - 7.0
undefined
The essay is logically organized and the ideas are connected, but there are some areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
- Ensure that your conclusion fully summarizes the arguments you have made in the essay.
The essay uses a range of vocabulary and there is some evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.
The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions.
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing the importance of providing free housing by the government, especially in the context of high inflation and its potential to promote social stability. The argument is well-developed and supported by relevant points, but the essay could benefit from more specific examples to illustrate the potential impact of such a policy. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.
Suggestions
- Include more specific examples to support your arguments.
- Ensure that each paragraph fully develops a single point or idea.