Some people think that increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles is the best way to solve environmental problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Severe environmental challenges has led people to believe that increasing the cost of fuel is the most efficient solution to minimize environmental issues,posing significant problems in urban cities.While this approach has some positive impacts,I truly believe that it does not work best on its own instead other more comprehensive measures should be also proritized.
Proponents of the method of raising the price of fuel argue that its assistance in improving air quality is tremendous,making big cities calmer and more sustainable but increasing the charge of fuel might discourage drivers from using their private cars,resulting in an increase in the number of public transport on the roads,meaning the more vehicles on the road the more dirty the air becomes,causing undeniable health problems such as respiratory problems,making peoples’ live harder to reside.This can largely lead to proliferation of bumper-to-bumper traffic,being extremely detrimental for the environment due to high amount of carbon emissions burnt by fuel-based cars.But,this strategy may encourage individuals to purchase environmental-friendly vehicles , which does not harm the air,leading to uncongested roads,those can be electric cars and non-motornized vehicles,helping to create more peaceful and traffic-free atmosphere for residents.However,this solely are not likely to combat environmental problems since there are also other powerful ways to clean the environments from pollutans.
More importantly,a broader measure is required to tackle serious environmental complications comprehensively.Governments should focus on reneweble energy such as solar,wind, and hydropower that can be replaced fossil fuel,being one of the main factors of negatively affected air.Industrial pollution,deforestation, and waste diposal are contributers to environmental degradation that fuel price increases cannot address itself.For example,stricter laws on factory emissions and creating limitations for the use of recources that have an direct impact on environment is absolutely worth implementing.If these measures are not implemented,combating these issus is almost impossible because the combination fuel charge increases and these measures may play a pivotal role in improving air quality in modernized cities.
In conclusion,although raising the cost of fuel may have a slight impact on atmosphere but the involvement of other methods are indispensable in providing efficient surroundings for communities.
The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. However, there are some areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. Clearer topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph and more explicit linking phrases would help guide the reader through the essay. Ensuring consistent punctuation and spacing will also improve readability.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
- Make sure that your arguments are presented in a clear and logical order.
The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the environment and economics. However, there are some instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity. For example, “proritized” should be “prioritized,” and “renewble energy” should be “renewable energy.” Ensuring correct spelling and grammar usage will also improve the overall quality of the essay.
The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay contains a few grammatical errors that affect clarity and readability. For example, “Severe environmental challenges has led people to believe” should be “Severe environmental challenges have led people to believe,” and “renueble energy” should be “renewable energy.” Correcting these errors and paying attention to grammar and punctuation will improve the overall quality of the essay.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the effectiveness of raising the cost of fuel in minimizing environmental issues. The writer presents a clear position and supports it with relevant examples. However, the essay could be improved by providing a more thorough analysis of the topic and by offering more specific examples to support the arguments. Additionally, the conclusion could be strengthened by summarizing the main points and restating the position more clearly.
Suggestions
- Try to develop your arguments more fully and support them with specific examples.
- Make sure that your conclusion effectively summarizes the main points of your essay and restates your position clearly.