Skip to main content

Difference between countries is becoming less evident. People have similar lifestyle, like eating same food, watching tv, liatening same musics. Do its advantages outweigh it disadvantages?

In an era of globalization, an increasing number of people tend to express similar living habits from cardinal needs such as food to entertaining activities. While this growing tendency may bring about cascading ramifications, I am inclined to think benefits are more significant.
Having a similar lifestyle can trigger a set of positive outcomes. The most prominent one is that it provides us with the opportunity of higher cultural understanding. As long as individuals throughout the world possess universal living ways, there is an exponential probability of reducing misunderstandings among nations, thereby enhancing international cohesion and social bonds as a whole. For instance, absence of dissimilarity of European nations’ lifestyles is considered to form as a single power against others, making regions at advantage. Another potential benefit reaped by this trend emerges as escalated business prospects. When a considerable amount of world population obtain the same choice, including nourishment, drinks, music, business owners in underdeveloped countries can revitalize their economic circumstances, thus resulting in development of whole nations. This in turn gives rise to diminish wide financial discrepancy among nations and intensify quality of people’s lives in underprivileged regions.
On the other hand, removing cultural barriers might come at a detriment to society. The fact that accumulating knowledge about various cultures serves as a potent trigger behind mass tourism to faraway places is hardly surprising. In a world where nations lack indispensable and unique cultural aspects, people may aspire not to allocate funds to travel to other regions. This phenomenon ultimately leads to financial predicament or political chaos in countries that have dependency on profits in light of tourism, strengthening global inequality and diminishing likelihood of economic stability all over the world.
In conclusion, globalization can be regarded as a double-edged sword as it offers numerous benefits such as improved understanding between people and host of demerits like erosion of cultures and lack of tourism which may have a huge financial toll on society. .However, despite these pitfalls, I hold the view think that benefits are far more pronounced.

8.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and related to the topic. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.

Suggestions
  • Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas.
  • Ensure that your examples are directly relevant to the point you are making.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.

The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. There are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions, but these do not impede communication.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. The arguments are well-developed and supported with relevant examples. However, the introduction could be improved to better introduce the topic and the writer’s position.

Suggestions
  • Consider rephrasing the introduction to make the topic and your position more clear.