Skip to main content

The diagram shows the skeletal systems of two ancestors of modern human beings.

The diagram illustrates variations in the skeletal structures of two early ancestral hominins, Australopithecus afarensis and Homo erectus.
Generally, both species are bipedal walkers, yet they exhibit distinct adaptations tailored to different lifestyles and environments. It is also clear that Australopithecus afarensis has a heavier body and significantly longer arms, while Homo erectus is more slender with well-developed joints.
Focusing on specific features, Australopithecus afarensis has an unstable head characterized by an elongated snout and elevated, slender shoulders. In contrast, Homo erectus possesses a well-aligned head with a short muzzle and broader, lower-set shoulders. Additionally, Australopithecus afarensis has a notably broader chest and waist, giving it a rounder appearance. Its relatively longer arms and larger hands suggest adaptations for climbing trees.
In the lower body, substantial differences are observed. Homo erectus exhibits a short femoral neck and large joints, which enhance support and balance during movement. The feet of Homo erectus are smaller and more arched, with a stabilized foot structure and shorter toes, making them well-suited for efficient locomotion. These structural discrepancies indicate that Homo erectus was significantly better equipped for long-distance running.
In conclusion, Australopithecus afarensis displays traits indicative of adaptations for both climbing and walking, whereas Homo erectus demonstrates a more advanced skeletal structure optimized for endurance running and upright walking.

7.5

The essay is well-organized with clear paragraphing and logical progression of ideas. Each paragraph focuses on specific features of the skeletal structures, maintaining a clear focus.

Suggestions
  • Ensure each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary accurately and appropriately. There is a good use of specific terminology related to skeletal structures.

The essay demonstrates a good range of grammatical structures with high accuracy. There are minor errors but they do not impede understanding.

The essay effectively addresses the task, providing a clear comparison of the skeletal structures of the two hominins. It includes relevant details and a clear conclusion.

Suggestions
  • Include more specific examples from the diagram to support comparisons.