Some people believe that universities should focus on practical skills for future employment rather than academic knowledge. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Universities serve as a cornerstone of knowledge, and whether they should emphasize practical skills or academic knowledge is a sparking and ongoing debate. In my opinion, while a learning approach based on practical experience can foster immediate employability, a strong academic foundation is a pivotal component of a student’s long-term career prospects.
Admittedly, project-based learning is mainly considered as an indispensable part of university education due to hands-on experience it can provide. By focusing on this method of teaching, universities prepare students ready for real-world challenges which they might face in their later lives. This, in turn, not only benefits students’ future, but also enhances likelihood of securing a place in job market immediately. Take an IT student as an example. The more internships and practical lessons they take, the more they solidify their knowledge they can directly apply in their future career.
Nevertheless, academic knowledge is indeed a stepping stone in every field for innovative breakthroughs and intellectual foundation. Without a solid theoretical understanding, students may lack analytical skills which are especially crucial in core subjects like mathematics, philosophy, and physics, to name just a few. Moreover, students gaining adequate theoretical concepts of their major can have foresight and analytical depth. These benefits gained through academic learning can lead to successful projects and a skill to adapt to emerging challenges in the future.
In conclusion, while practical skills are essential for preparing students for job market, I firmly believe that theoretical knowledge lies at the core of any innovation and long-term professional growth.
The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas.
- Ensure that your paragraphs have a clear central topic.
The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.
The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. There are a few minor errors, but they do not impede communication.
The essay addresses the task fully and presents a well-developed response with relevant, extended and supported ideas. However, the introduction could be more engaging.
Suggestions
- Consider revising the introduction to make it more engaging and to provide a clearer roadmap of the essay’s structure.