Skip to main content

Share of income earned by top 1 percent, 1915-2015

The line graph illustrates the data on proportion of revenue top 1 percent of public earners over four decade period starting from 1975 in 7 countries according to CEA 2017 Economic report of the President, relying on World Wealth and Income Database.
From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that except for the UK and Germany, all countries’ affluent parts’ income recorded from the beginning of the period (1975), and it is notably that every country indicate upward trend, with Italy, Japan and France increasing less significantly compared to others. Additionally, the US has the richest layer while the lowest income belonged to France.
Focusing on Germany, the share of it underwent wild fluctuations over the period by 2007 from 10% to 4% more ,however, this share was not maintained. Although Canada started at approximately 9%, the highest proportion, in 1975, the US overtook, doubling form 8% to 18% when Canada reached to around 14%. In 1990, the UK join the poll and saw a significant increase from 10% to over 15% before plunging by 2%.
As for rest of countries they experienced mildly fluctuation and followed almost similar patterns. They reached nearly 9%., starting at over and under 7% which meant that there is no big difference in the salary of poor and rich.

5.0

The essay presents information in a logical sequence but lacks clear paragraphing and topic sentences. Transitions between ideas are present but could be more explicit.

Suggestions
  • Use clear paragraph breaks.
  • Include topic sentences for each paragraph.
  • Improve transitions between ideas.

The essay uses a range of vocabulary but lacks precision in some areas. There are occasional errors in word choice.

The essay contains several grammatical errors that affect clarity. Sentence structures are varied but not always accurate.

The essay addresses the task but lacks detailed analysis and precision. Some data is inaccurately represented.

Suggestions
  • Provide more detailed analysis.
  • Ensure data is accurately represented.
  • Include more specific examples from the graph.