Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication
There is a view that people should create a new language for global communication. However, in my opinion, there is no need for a new language because there are already other widespread languages.
A new language can be helpful when it is created by a mix of various languages, but previous attempts to invent new languages did not result in productive outcomes. Esperanto can be a good case in point. This constructed language is only spoken by 10,000 people, despite being available for a hundred years. It means that inventing a new tongue can be favored by millions , but It’s much more difficult than one can imagine.
There is no need for a new language, as we have other global languages, such as English, French, and Spanish, which are globally popular, especially English. English is easier to learn compared to other languages. Moreover, this language is spoken by billions, and we can make it more prevalent by promoting it to other areas where it is unknown. It leads to economic advantages since the communication between countries will be improved , and businesses will be able to negotiate internationally. As a result, more people are exposed to becoming bilingual or even polyglot.
In conclusion, there is no need to create a new tongue, as we have other languages such as English and French, which are used effectively. If people ever try to invent a new language, it will be just a waste of time and resources.
The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas.
- Ensure that your arguments are fully developed in each paragraph.
The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.
The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. The arguments are well-developed and supported with relevant examples. However, the introduction could be improved to better introduce the topic and the writer’s position.
Suggestions
- Consider rephrasing the introduction to provide a clearer and more engaging overview of the topic and your position.