Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about news. Do you agree or disagree
It has been suggested that newspapers are the best option to keep up-to-date. While They were once main source of information , I believe that they are no longer the best way to learn about news.
On the one hand , technological developments such as online platforms , phones , computers and the like make it easy to access to information than than newspapers do. Firstly , digital news are more accessible than news on the newspapers because of their advancements . for instance , digital platforms offer any information at anywhere as newspapers are often limited by daily publication . secondly , news on digital platforms are free while newspapers are costly. So news on digital development is far more better than those on newspapers.
On the other hand , newspapers aren’t good option as before because of the technological development . firstly , with development of technology such as phones laptops and the like people can get information faster and free . for example , people who get information from newspapers have to pay for it while others who learn about news through electronic devices don’t . secondly , individuals can get information faster through devices such as phones or computers than newspapers . for instance , digital sources offer easy access to any information from anywhere while newspapers only available in physical form. So it is obvious that newspapers are not the best way to receive information.
In conclusion, it seems to me that in terms of speed , accessibility and variety newspapers are less effective than today’s digital development. Therefore , I disagree with the idea that newspapers are the best way to learn about news.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the argument less fluid. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the key points and clearly stating the position.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the key points and clearly state your position.
The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. For example, “news on digital development” should be “digital news,” and “far more better” should be “much better.”
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar and punctuation. However, these do not impede communication. The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are some grammatical errors that can hinder understanding. For example, “news on digital platforms are free” should be “digital news is free,” and “while newspapers only available in physical form” should be “while newspapers are only available in physical form.”
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the limitations of newspapers in providing news and comparing them to digital platforms. The writer takes a clear position, arguing that digital platforms are superior for getting news. However, the argument could be more fully developed with more specific examples and a clearer structure in the conclusion.
Suggestions
- Include more specific examples to support your arguments.
- Ensure that each paragraph has a clear main idea and that all sentences in the paragraph support this idea.