Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Today there is a perception that wild animals have no role in the nature, that is why trying to preserve is a waste of resources. While there are some factors supporting their view, I believe wild animals are an essential part of the ecosystem.
On the one hand, protecting wildlife requires a lot of fund and effort. Initially, conservationists report that almost 10 billion dollars is spent on preserving wild animals over the globe, causing arguments among some individuals this money should be invested in others fields like education and healthcare. Additionally, an increasing number of people are involved in the process that requires a lot of hard work and attention. If they paid more attention to other things mentioned above, these spheres would be more developed.
Despite the afore mentioned reasons, protecting wildlife is not important for only the environment, but also for the survival of human kind. Firstly, wild animals play a significant role in maintaining balance of the ecology. The extinction of one species of wild animals results in the over population of herbivores, which is very harmful to several plants. Secondly, some people earn a lot of money by preserving wild animals. For instance, Dean Sneider, a conservationist blogger, gain a huge amount of income through posting videos regarding protection of wild animals on YouTube. Finally, most of wild animals live in various habitats like rainforests or savannahs that provide the Earth with fresh air. When wild animals become extinct, these habitats will disappear owing to several reasons, which is a great threat for the whole environment as well as human beings.
In conclusion, in spite of some people’s underestimation of the significance of wild animals, it is so important to protect them that guarantees the existence of the planet.

7.0

The essay is logically organized and the ideas are connected well. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.

Suggestions

Use more linking words to improve the flow of ideas.
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central topic.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary relevant to the topic. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity. Additionally, the use of more specific examples could enhance the discussion.

The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures and is generally grammatically accurate. However, there are a few minor errors that could be corrected for clarity. Additionally, the use of more complex grammatical structures could enhance the discussion.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. However, the argument could be more fully developed in places. The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing the perception that protecting wild animals is a waste of resources and providing a reasoned argument in favor of their protection. The essay could be strengthened by providing more specific examples and by addressing potential counterarguments. Additionally, the conclusion could be more comprehensive.