Some people believe that environmental problems can only be solved by governments and large organizations. Others argue that individuals can also make a significant difference. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There is a debate over who plays a vital role in solving environmental issues, with some emphasizing it is the responsibility of governments and big businesses and others arguing people also a key factor for tackling those problems. In my opinion, although government with large companies contribute to mitigate environmental issues, people are the one who play a pivotal role to tackle them.
On the one hand, the government and large organizations are indeed the one who can change the perspectives of people, especially the former might change the usage of the materials that the latter is using. I mean that, money is the main reason why companies use cheap materials, which are contributing negatively to the environment. For example, there was one factory where used chemicals, which might cause not only health problems to humans but also animals. In fact, these creatures provide trees with fertilizers. Thus, if this process stops, deforestation will start occurring.
However, i agree with those who argue that individuals are the main factor for getting rid of problems related to ecology. If people started noticing the negative effects of using the packages, those do not decay even in a century, there would not be such a issue, causing to global warming that influencing ice to melt now. Furthermore, if people start abandoning the use of cars, contributing to the increase of greenhouse gas emission, instead using electric cars, it will definitely help to address problems that are occurring now.
In conclusion, while the government and large companies can regulate the usage of chemicals, which affecting environmental issues, individuals equally help to tackle economic problems.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s opinion.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and clearly state your opinion.

The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the environment and economics. However, there are some instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy. Additionally, the use of more varied and precise language could help to strengthen the argument.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar and punctuation. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, but there are some grammatical errors and punctuation issues that can affect the overall clarity. For example, the use of capital letters and punctuation is not always accurate. Proofreading the essay for these errors and focusing on sentence variety could help to improve the overall quality of the writing.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the roles of governments, large organizations, and individuals in solving environmental issues. The writer presents a clear position, stating that while governments and large businesses contribute to mitigating environmental issues, individuals play a pivotal role in tackling them. However, the argument could be more fully developed with additional supporting details and examples. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.