Skip to main content

In many countries, the quality of life in large cities is becoming worse. What do you think are the causes of this problem? What measures could be taken to solve it?

Around the world, the quality of life in urban areas is deteriorating. While this tendency can be attributed to two major factors, there are some sensible policies that could address the issue.
One root cause of the trend is an uneven distribution of resources. Currently, there are numerous cities across the globe – in India, the middle East and the central Asia, to name but a few – where bodies in power allocate resources irrationally, resulting in underdeveloped socio-economic infrastructure. This occurs as a result of placing too much emphasis on mainstream economic areas, such as trade, business and manufacturing, most of which are, more often than not, based in urban zones.
Another noteworthy reason is elevating rates of pollution in urban places. These areas often face pressing issues related to overcrowding, poor space and land management practices and a lack of green zones, so, over time, these translate into air, water, noise and soil pollution. With these challenges, the quality of life in cities is bound to decline.
Nevertheless, there are some effective approaches that could mitigate the worsening quality of life in cities. One of such measures is optimizing the flow of resources so that all areas of economy and regions within a country equally benefit from it. This, in turn, can yield tangible rewards, since the directed funds could be expended on tackling pollution, leveraging food security, minimizing crime rates – the positive effects which ease social fault lines and bridge socio-economic gaps, thereby improving living standards.
In addition to this is another no less significant solution – a shift in societal attitudes. With citizens willing to cooperate authorities in bolstering the quality of life and forming grassroots, urban zones are very likely to be driven out of poor life standards. As such, it is governing bodies that should promote this collaboration via government-funded projects, which encourage locals to take action as it happens in Uzbekistan, where the government allocates a fraction of the state’s budget to hold such initiatives.
To sum up, discrepancies in resource allocation and rising levels of pollution are the aspects that account for the decline in the quality of life in cities, and this issue could be alleviated if an even distribution of resources and a change societal attitudes were to come about.

8.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs that each discuss a single cause and solution, and a concise conclusion. You use transition words effectively to guide the reader through your points (“One root cause,” “Another noteworthy reason,” “Nevertheless”). To improve cohesion, ensure that each paragraph focuses on a single main idea and that the ideas within paragraphs are logically ordered and connected to each other and to the main topic.

Suggestions
  • Try to use a wider range of linking words to improve the flow of ideas.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. A wide range of vocabulary is used appropriately and accurately. You demonstrate a good command of vocabulary, with terms like “sensible policies,” “uneven distribution of resources,” and “tangible rewards” effectively conveying your points. To further enhance your lexical resource, consider using a greater variety of vocabulary, including synonyms and more complex language, to avoid repetition and add depth to your writing.

The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. The majority of sentences are error-free. A few minor errors do not detract from the overall clarity. Your essay displays a good control of a range of grammatical structures, with a variety of sentence types used effectively. There are minor errors that do not significantly impact the readability or the overall quality of your writing. To further improve, pay attention to the consistency of verb tenses and ensure subject-verb agreement is maintained throughout your essay.

The essay addresses the task effectively. The writer presents a clear position and supports it with relevant examples. The conclusion is logical and relevant. You have addressed all parts of the task by identifying two root causes of the problem and suggesting two solutions. Your position is clear, and you have provided relevant examples to support your points. To enhance your response, consider providing a brief explanation or example of how the shift in societal attitudes could be implemented or encouraged by government bodies, as this would provide a more comprehensive answer to the prompt.

Suggestions
  • Consider providing a brief explanation or example of how the shift in societal attitudes could be implemented or encouraged by government bodies.