In an era characterized by diversity and globalization, people have differing opinions on whether there should be a universal language. While formulating a universal language offers undeniable advantages, I firmly believe that it should not be created, as it causes social inequality and loss of cultural biodiversity.
Proponents of creating a universal language present various persuasive reasons to support their stance. If countries have a shared language, they can easily communicate with people from different backgrounds and cultures, thereby significantly enhancing their perspectives. This broadened horizon helps them understand and value other cultural norms, leaving no room for debilitating feelings of prejudice, degradation, and alienation. In a world where international conflicts arise as a result of the lack of mutual understanding between countries, having a fixed language can make a big difference when it comes to resolving issues and fostering meaningful relationships.
Despite these advantages in favor of inventing a common language, I contend that this trend causes serious global issues on a broader scale. When countries adopt a shared language, they engage with one another using a universal language for long periods. This continual interaction heavily affects minor languages, such as Cornish, Manx, and Mainu, which are on the verge of extinction, significantly harming both cultural identity and diversity. In an era marked by social media apps, such as Instagram, Facebook, and X, designed to bring people from different cultural backgrounds together and adapt to other cultures, it comes as no surprise if nations lose their cultures.
Another serious threat caused by formulating a universal language is social inequality. If nations adopt a shared language, the dominant language, like English in our world, gains superiority over any other languages, leading to the potential marginalization of other cultures and languages. This linguistic imperialism puts immense barriers for those who do not know this language when it comes to employment, education, and access to information and services, potentially causing social stratification among people, with fluent speakers having greater access and power.
In conclusion, although the development of a shared language offers benefits by addressing international conflicts and broadening people’s horizons, I argue that its disadvantages outweigh the advantages, as it causes social inequality and the loss of cultural diversity.