Skip to main content
Category

band 6.5 essay

band 6.5 essay

Some people think that the government should allocate money to support the art, while others believe that this money could be better spent on other public sectors. Although arts are important, I, personally, do advocate for the latter viewpoint, as other areas such as healthcare and education deserve more priority. There are many reasons why government should spent money on arts. The predominant reason is that artists preserve culture. Musicians and painters reflect a nation’s identity and history by their artworks. To clarify, many art works such as painting and sculptures are exhibited in museums, meaning many more people can learn the history of it. The second reason why authorities should support the art is that art can boost local economy by attracting many tourists. Many people are tend to learn and see the art works around the world. Take the painting of Mona Lisa as an example. This painting was drawn by Leonardo da Vinci and is exhibited in Louvre museum in Paris. Countries like France benefit from promoting their artists. On the other hand, critics argue that government recourses should be focused on areas that directly impact public welfare, such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Art, while enriching is often considered a luxury rather than a necessity, and private patrons and commercial ventures can adequately support it. In developing countries, for example, addressing basic needs like clean water and accessible healthcare far outweighs the importance of funding art projects. Thus, allocating funds to the arts n such contexts can be seen as a misallocation of recourses. In conclusion, while supporting artists can enrich a nation’s culture and economical state, public funds should primarily address essential needs like healthcare and education.