Developments in science and technology have cause environmental issues. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others think that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In the characterised era, developments in science and technology have led to environmental issues. Some people consider that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others think that science and technology can solve environmental problems. In my opinion, science and technology developments not only improve air quality but also mitigate the amount of waste.
On the one hand, a simpler lifestyle means consuming fewer resources, leading to less pollution and waste. For example, introducing bike scheme projects, which prevent air pollution and promote air quality. These vehicles do not require fossil fuels and do not emit hazardous gases. Because of the utilisation of cars and huge trucks, the largest amount of damage to the environment, for which they are responsible for air pollution.
On the other hand, utilizing the source of wind, solar and hydropower, which limit the reliance on fossil fuels. Because these fuels not only bring air pollution but also lead to the depletion of the ozone layer. Sustainable energies enhance air quality and are beneficial for people’s lives. Currently, developed countries invest more money in sustainable energies, solving environmental problems.
Furthermore, prioritising more money for recycling technologies, which mitigates the amount of garbage. Because the influx of people utilises packaging products, leading to an increase in the amount of waste. Recycling systems help to limit pollution. Thus, creating a recycling system can solve environmental issues.
To conclude, developments in science have caused environmental dilemmas. Some people believe that an efficient way of life will protect the environment, while others consider that science and technology can address environmental problems. In my point of view, science and technology can boost air quality and limit the amount of garbage.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the connection between some ideas and paragraphs could be improved. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the transition to the first body paragraph is a bit abrupt. Clearer topic sentences and more explicit transitions would enhance the overall flow of the essay. Additionally, the conclusion could be more comprehensive, summarizing the main points discussed and providing a clear final thought.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transitions between ideas and paragraphs.
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central idea and that all sentences in the paragraph support this idea.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with appropriate use of academic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity. Additionally, the use of more varied and precise vocabulary could help to convey the ideas more effectively.

The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay demonstrates a good command of grammar and sentence structure, with few errors. However, there are a few minor grammatical errors and awkward constructions that could be revised for clarity. Additionally, the use of more varied sentence structures could help to make the writing more engaging and dynamic.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay effectively addresses the prompt, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The arguments are well-developed and supported with relevant examples. However, the conclusion could be more comprehensive, summarizing the main points discussed and providing a clear final thought.