Hadija JIS

There are people that believe everyone should be able to study in universities despite their low academic level. In this essay we will be discussing pros and cons of allowing admission to university study programs regardless of their level of academic ability.
First, let’s talk about positive sides of our topic. The main advantage is that it gives a good opportunity for not successful students. Whith this chance that students can continue learning and by the time improve their skills. This free admission can open new doors for some of us. By saying “not successful” I mean students that have understanding, family ,money or other problems.
It’s universally proven that everything has its own plusses and minuses. Our theme is not exception. If a university allows everyone to study, it becomes crisis for everyone. By mentioning “everyone” I am saying not only university itself, country also. If that is allowed for everyone, most of the students will just come, spend time and go. Admisson exams allow to filter students who will really study and bring country to top. While smart students will go with their own way, others will look to them and get motivated. Even if they fail a lot of exams, one day they will surely do it. Failures make people strong.
Conclusion is that allowing admission to university study programs regardless of their level of academic abilities, positive outcome is to help for needing people. Con is that it brings problems for everyone. Yes, we don’t know in which situation person is but not everyone will fairly study hard.

5.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay is structured with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, which helps in maintaining a logical flow. However, there are some issues with coherence as the ideas are not always clearly connected. For example, the transition from discussing the positive aspects to the negative aspects is abrupt, and the use of cohesive devices could be improved. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and providing a clear final thought.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure the conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and provides a clear final thought.

The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the topic. However, there are some instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that can be distracting. For example, the phrase “Admisson exams allow to filter students who will really study and bring country to top” is awkward and could be rephrased for clarity. Additionally, the use of more precise and varied vocabulary could help in conveying the ideas more effectively.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are few grammatical errors. However, there are some errors in article and preposition usage. The essay demonstrates a good control of a range of grammatical structures. However, there are some grammatical errors that can affect the clarity of the writing. For example, the phrase “Admisson exams allow to filter students who will really study and bring country to top” should be “Admission exams allow filtering of students who are committed to their studies and can potentially elevate the country’s standing.” Additionally, the use of articles and prepositions is not always accurate, and some sentences could be rephrased for clarity.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the pros and cons of allowing admission to university study programs regardless of academic ability. The writer presents a clear position and supports it with relevant examples. However, the argument could be more fully developed, and the essay could benefit from a more detailed exploration of the implications of the policy. Additionally, the conclusion could be more comprehensive in summarizing the main points and reinforcing the writer’s stance.