In recent times, housing is one of the basic needs of humans. Some people believe that providing free houses for some people who have low wage problems is the work of the government. I partially agree with this statement. While offering free houses for homeless people is a good improvement, I think that making these houses cheaper instead of making them free is a better alternative to housing problems.
On one hand, providing free houses can bring benefits to low-income families. It can reduce homelessness rates in the country and provide a chance to live in safe, healthy environments. For instance, families living on streets or in unsafe areas can have a better quality of life if they are given free housing. Also, this can help children from these families focus on their education and escape the cycle of poverty in the future. Additionally, if people have access to housing, they would find stable jobs and help the economy of the country.
On the other hand, offering free houses has drawbacks for the government’s budget. Spending too much on free housing can lead to cuts in other areas such as healthcare and education. Instead, the government should focus on building low-rent houses for people based on their income. For example, in some countries, the government offers subsidies to make housing cheaper rather than making it completely free. This ensures that housing help is given to the people who need it most without causing too many money problems for the government.
In conclusion, while free housing can help the problem of homelessness and improve people’s lives, it is not a practical solution in the long term. Governments should focus on providing affordable houses and creating new job opportunities to help people afford home themselves.