Housing is a basic necessity for everyone. Therefore, government should provide free housing for people who cannot afford to pay it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One of the critical problems the world is dealing with today is the lack of affordable housing. Many believe that the government should supply free housing for homeless individuals. While there are valid arguments supporting this idea, I disagree with this perspective due to the financial burden on governments and the risk of mismanagement.
One significant benefit of providing free housing is that it reduces inequality and improves public health. Homelessness is closely linked to poor health, malnutrition, and mental illness. By offering housing, governments can help people improve both physically and mentally. Additionally, free housing can break the cycle of poverty by allowing individuals to focus on education and employment rather than struggling to pay rent. As a result, these individuals may achieve greater financial and social equality. For example, a research group in the United States conducted a study where 20 homeless individuals were given housing. The participants reported feeling more secure and confident, enabling them to focus on rebuilding their lives. Therefore, free housing promotes public health and social justice by offering people a fresh start.
Despite these benefits, I believe that providing free housing creates a significant financial burden for governments. Housing projects are often expensive and may lead to higher taxes, which could burden taxpayers. Furthermore, such initiatives may face challenges like corruption, poor planning, and low-quality construction, making them unsustainable in the long term. Allocating funds to more essential areas, such as education and healthcare, may have a greater impact on improving society. For instance, in developed countries like South Korea, investments in education have enabled individuals to secure high-paying jobs, reducing the need for free housing programs. Thus, while free housing may seem beneficial, its financial and practical drawbacks cannot be overlooked.
In conclusion, although free housing can reduce inequality and improve public health, I firmly believe that the financial burden and potential mismanagement make this approach impractical. Instead, governments should focus on more sustainable solutions, such as providing subsidies or creating opportunities for education and employment, to address the root causes of homelessness effectively.
The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas.
- Ensure that your arguments are fully developed in each paragraph.
The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.
The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. There are a few minor errors, but they do not impede communication.
The essay addresses the task fully and presents a well-developed response. The writer’s position is clear throughout the essay. However, the writer could provide more specific examples to support their arguments.
Suggestions
- Try to include more specific examples to support your arguments.
- Ensure that each paragraph focuses on a single main idea.