Housing is a basic necessity for everyone. Therefore, government should provide free housing for people who cannot afford to pay it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a view that every person needs housing estate .So, authorities should sustain free house for poor people who can not afford to possess shelter. While some say this is unfair to present them free house whereas others strive to lease an apartment, I belive that it is effective way donating home to poors due to gaining public respect and reducing poverty.
To donate an apartment to impoverished citizens is unfair action while others spend their time and effort for saving money to purchase a house. In that case, some people tend to pretend themselves as a poor or there will be high possibility of protest, as well as riot. Government should just provide homeless people with a job that can set the stage for leasing apartment. Because there is nothing impossible if humanbeing pursues and persists, even for disabled, let alone homeless citizens.
However, these initiatives can cause public honour. Citizens reach a compromise that government is consisted with merciful and good-hearted managers. Besides, the mutual belief between public and government improves. Consequently, the government can manage or make public obey their rules.
Dropping of poverty is another compelling reason to donate shelter to underprivileged people. Wealth of country measures by circumstances of its public. For instance, Africa is supposed that one of the rich country with its abundance gold resources, however due to financial state of its public, everyone think that Africa is one of the poor country.
To sum up, despite the drawbacks of house donation to people who cannot afford to possess shelter, I belive that such kind of initiatives can cause public regard, as well as, contributing to decrease poverty .

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the stance on the issue.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to link all the ideas in a paragraph to the main point of the paragraph.

The essay uses a range of vocabulary and there is some evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary relevant to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar and punctuation. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, which adds some variety and interest to the writing. However, there are several grammatical errors that can hinder understanding and disrupt the flow of the essay. Punctuation is also often misused, further affecting the clarity of the writing.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position and supporting it with relevant examples. The writer’s opinion is clearly stated, and the essay provides a well-structured argument with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the stance on the issue.