Housing is a basic necessity for everyone. Therefore, government should provide free housing for people who cannot afford to pay it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a view that housing facilities are important for humanity.That is why,government must supply the poor people with free houses. Although, there are some arguments justifying the aforementioned point, I completely disagree to which because of necessity to other free facilities as well as unfair implementation of government to poor people.
Existence of many facilities which must be free is the one reason not to spend government’s outcome to free housing. Some fields such as educational, agricultural and industrial fields demand large proportion of outlay. Furthermore, if those fields will be thriving, that would be practical not only to those companies themselves, but also to all society, country and even to all of the world. Because, education, agriculture and industry is pillar for existence of humankind. However, compared to free housing, after providing poor people with houses, there would be nothing more than gratitudes and thankfullness of those people. This means that government can not achieve anything important.
Unfair initiatives to people is another reason for not to provide free housing. Let is imagine, some humans try hard to purchase homes, cars and other items. Therefore, they are working day by day, night by night. After numerous challenges, they eventually gain those kind of things. But other people are doing nothing and they are just looking forward to aforementioned items from government for free, without any physical, mental and emotional challenges.That state is illegal implementation by government.
In conclusion, despite some justifications of providing homes without money for people who can not afford to pay off them, I believe that housing must not be provided for free because of abundance of other more necessary fields as well as illegal stance of government to human distinction

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the stance.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and reiterate your stance.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical resource. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are only minor errors. However, there are some issues with word form and spelling that can be distracting. The essay demonstrates a good control of a range of grammatical structures, with only minor errors. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect phrasing that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the prompt and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay could benefit from a more detailed exploration of the counter-argument and a stronger conclusion that reinforces the main points.