Housing is a basic necessity for everyone. Therefore, government should provide free housing for people who cannot afford to pay it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a view that government should shoulder the responsibility of covering the housing payment for those who cannot afford it. This is because housing is considered as a major importance for each individual. While some people think government funding can cause serious problems, such as economical burden, others hold the opinion that housing necessities should be paid by the authority for poor people. I agree with the second point of view.
Opponents contend that if poor people’s expenses on housing are covered by the government’s budget, this development may arise the risk of financial issues within the country. The whole system of housing acquires a great amount of sums. Once a country takes the whole charge of paying for housing needs of lower-class families, it should be ready to spend great amounts of money on house appliances. However, these expenses can be spent on the development of different infrastructures, like new and smoother roads, high-rise buildings, and business centers. Therefore, some believe individuals should not rely on government’s financial support for their housing necessities, as it leads to fiscal problems.
However, despite the abovementioned disadvantages, I assert that poor people need the government’s housing aid, so that their requests should be taken into account. This means that if the authorities allocate some amount of money for housing appliances of citizens, who come from lower-income backgrounds, this not only eases their financial lacking for their housing but also helps keep the equity among people, irrespective of their financial backgrounds. While rich people can afford to live in big mansions or 2 storey houses with the latest technologies, the poor also want to have a life as the rich. If the government tends to help, this can help to fulfill poor people’s life-long intentions. Consequently, the government support in these cases, when ordinary people’s wishes come true, increases the loyalty of citizens towards their countries.
In conclusion, although the responsibility of paying house charges for poor people can lead to fiscal burden in particular country, it has brought more benefits, like a sense of fulfillment, equality among people, regardless of backgrounds and an increased loyalty towards the government between lower- income citizens.

7.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The use of transition words and phrases helps to guide the reader through the text. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved. For example, in the second paragraph, the transition from discussing the financial burden to the benefits of providing housing can be a bit abrupt. More cohesive devices could be used to link these ideas more smoothly.

Suggestions

Try to use a wider range of linking words to improve the flow of ideas.
Ensure that there is a clear connection between all parts of your argument.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. A variety of vocabulary and idiomatic expressions are used appropriately. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary, with appropriate use of academic language. However, there are a few instances where word choice could be improved for clarity and precision. For example, in the first paragraph, the phrase “this development may arise the risk of financial issues within the country” is a bit awkward and could be rephrased for clarity.

The essay uses a variety of complex structures. The majority of sentences are free of grammatical errors. However, there are a few minor errors that do not significantly impact the overall clarity of the essay. The essay demonstrates a good command of a range of grammatical structures, with few errors. However, there are a few minor errors that could be addressed for clarity and precision. For example, in the first paragraph, the phrase “this development may arise the risk of financial issues within the country” could be rephrased for clarity and accuracy.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The essay provides relevant, extended and supported ideas. The essay effectively addresses the prompt, providing a clear position and supporting it with relevant examples and arguments. The essay also considers the opposing viewpoint and effectively refutes it. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples to support the arguments.