Housing is a basic necessity for everyone. Therefore, government should provide free housing for people who cannot afford to pay it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a view that government have to supply free houses people who can not afford to pay it. I believe that state should provide free gifted properties.
On the one hand, the notion that accepting free houses from government may lead to significant economic challenges. As an excessive use of money to residential areas means that there may not be enough funds to allocate for other spheres such as education. For example, Greece’s economic crisis partly stemmed from extremely welfare programs
On the other hand, providing free residential areas can play a vital role in improving people’s lives. In other words, many lodgers often struggle to pay their rental apartment.This financial burden may prevent from concentrating more important aspects in life especially education. If government offer gifted house for people who really need, they may not have any distractions from achieving their goals.For instance, students living in rental houses might spend most of their time in part-time job in order to cover their rent fees instead of dedicating themselves to studying and acquiring new skills. Consequently, it may impact on academical performance negatively.
In conclusion, while there are some drawbacks to providing housing for the less fortunate, such as reduced funds for other vital sectors, it can significantly improve the lives of individuals struggling with financial strains.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s position.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and clearly state your position.

The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar and punctuation. The essay uses a variety of complex and simple sentence structures, but there are some grammatical errors and punctuation mistakes that can affect the overall clarity. Reviewing and revising for these errors can help improve the overall quality of the writing.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position and supporting it with relevant examples. The writer considers both the economic challenges and the social benefits of providing free housing, which makes for a well-balanced argument. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples and by ensuring that each paragraph focuses on a single main idea.