Skip to main content

Housing is a basic necessity for everyone. Therefore, government should provide free housing for people who cannot afford to pay it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a view that government have to supply free houses people who do not have affordability to pay it. I believe that state should focus on other important things such as education, sport and health care
On the one hand, providing free residential areas can play vital role of potential future growth. In other words, many lodgers struggle to pay their rental apartment.This means that, they may not have opportunities for more important aspects than money, especially on educational institutions. For example, if students study abroad, they have to pay money for apartment fees and they may spend huge amount of time for working. Consequently, It may cause to academical performance negatively. So that, if government offer free house for people who really need, they can concentrate on more significant concerns.
On the other hand, the notion that accepting free houses from government may enhance feeling of laziness.The reason is that they may demotivated to work hard. In other words, people have to achieve success with being self-doer in many circumstances. If government always pay free things for poor people, not only it tend to people’s work productivity but also it give rise to government economical stability. For example, excessive welfare programs can limit funds available for essential services such as healthcare or education.
In conclusion, While there are some benefits of funding houses for poverty public including future growth, it has also negative sides with demotivating for work

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the overall stance on the issue.

Suggestions
  • Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
  • Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and clearly state your position on the issue.

The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. However, these errors do not generally impede communication. The essay uses a variety of complex and simple sentence structures, but there are some grammatical errors and inaccuracies in punctuation and spelling that can hinder understanding. These errors need to be addressed to improve the overall clarity and professionalism of the essay.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed, and the essay could benefit from more specific examples to support the points being made.

Suggestions
  • Ensure that your argument is fully developed and supported with specific examples.