Housing is a basic necessity for everyone. Therefore, government should provide free housing for people who cannot afford to pay it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a view that homes are the most important item for everyone to live in this world. So the government of every country must give free houses for humans who can not pay the cash for accommodations. I completely disagree for this given view due to having any negative effects.
Some people think, the governments must provide with free accommodations for their population who have not enough money to buy it. Because they believe that the governmment is obliged to provide free homes so that its people do not suffer. If the government do not that segregation will be improved among society as a result the equality will be disappear. Equality provides with positive feeling among people, in addition it help to improve their main skills. But this action has a lot negative effects too, so I do not support this given opinion.
I think that without blaming the government in this case, the residents themselves should try for buying house themselves, striving for a better life. If free housing is guaranteed by the government, people will not try to buy a home, and as a result, they will lean on the government. Furthermore, people don’t feel obligated and blame someone for any problems they may have.
In conclusion, the government has no obligation to provide people with free housing and should strive to ensure that everyone can buy a house on their own.

5.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the key points and reiterating the stance.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the key points and reiterate your stance.

The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common items. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, with some attempts to use less common items. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity. Additionally, the use of more varied and precise vocabulary could help to strengthen the argument.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. However, these errors do not generally impede communication. The essay contains several grammatical errors that affect the overall clarity and readability. These include issues with subject-verb agreement, tense consistency, and preposition use. Proofreading to correct these errors is recommended. Additionally, the essay could benefit from a wider range of sentence structures to more effectively convey complex ideas.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the prompt by presenting a clear argument that the government is not obligated to provide free housing for all citizens. The writer’s position is clearly stated, and the essay provides a reasoned argument against the government providing free housing. However, the essay could be strengthened by providing more specific examples to support the argument and by addressing potential counterarguments more thoroughly.