Skip to main content

Housing should be free or not

Given that habitation is a need for everyone, whether government should introduce free accommodation or not remains unresolved. A combination of a quality of life and equality could be seen advantageous while dependency issues and financial burden on government could hinder this project occurring. Personally, I side with latter view for more
The main factor to enact free housing is undoubtedly a good way of life of people who are not financially independent. Access to stable home can improve resident mental health, physical wellbeing, education, and employment opportunities, creating conscious and flourished society and gain strong reputation among other societies as a result. Apart from only a good lifestyle, equality also could be ascribed to take this proposal into action. As long as Impoverished population has their own estate as affluent population, the conflict and contempt due to discrepancy in wealth may be mitigated, in turn families start residing in stability. Thus, this program can be mutually beneficial for people and state.
However, such a proposal could boost dependency issues. People, when they are willingly supposed to work diligently to purchase a new house and strive for financial independence, may retreat for long-term reliance on aid, in turn causing nation to not allocate budget to other pressing issues such as education, sport, transit, along with health care. Additionally, It could make happen financial strain in state economy. To sustain the all poor with refuge requires immense funding which engender higher taxes. Particularly, If the authority wants to implement this into practice, then to construct the houses demands incredible fund, so society are forced to gain money in expense of heavy taxation in residents.
To sum up, although quality in life of individuals and equality can arise, reduce in economy and excessively dependency overweight benefits so that it harms more than good.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay is structured in a way that makes the argument easy to follow, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices, which can make the argument seem a bit disjointed. Additionally, the use of pronouns and other referencing words is sometimes unclear, which can make it difficult to follow the argument.

Suggestions
  • Try to use a variety of cohesive devices to make the relationships between your ideas more explicit. This will help to make your argument more clear and coherent.

The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice, which can detract from the overall clarity and effectiveness of the essay. Additionally, the use of synonyms and paraphrasing is sometimes unclear, which can make it difficult to understand the intended meaning.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. However, these errors do not generally impede communication. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, which adds to the overall interest and effectiveness of the writing. However, there are some grammatical errors and inaccuracies in punctuation and spelling, which can detract from the overall clarity and effectiveness of the essay. Additionally, there are some issues with word formation and spelling, which can make it difficult to understand the intended meaning.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the potential benefits and drawbacks of providing free housing. The writer presents a clear position and supports it with relevant examples and explanations. However, the argument could be more fully developed, and the essay could provide more specific examples to support the points being made. Additionally, the conclusion could be strengthened by providing a more definitive statement of the writer’s position.

Suggestions
  • Try to develop your argument more fully and provide more specific examples to support your points. This will help to make your writing more persuasive and engaging.