In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, we live in an era where many styles of city design exist. Some architects prefer to place administrative buildings near amusement centres, as in Tashkent, but there is another approach that focuses on separating buildings from each other, as in Barcelona. However, the latter approach is more common in developed countries. In my opinion, this method of allocating buildings has unique features as well as potential drawbacks.
There are various advantages, and one of the most vital is the convenience for city dwellers. Such an approach allows planners to differentiate specific areas for particular interests. For instance, there can be a district for shopping, where the majority of malls and boutiques are located, and citizens will know where to go to purchase goods. Additionally, this can also be beneficial for students. All academic and educational institutions can be concentrated in a specific area, where students from different fields of study can meet each other. This will lead to the sharing of ideas and the development of youth.
Moreover, zoning shops, schools, offices, and homes can be a solution for major problems that most developing cities experience, such as traffic jams. If these places are located in specific areas, the level of traffic will steadily decrease. Also, this can be a solid solution to the problem of noise pollution in big cities. The number of car horns and other noises emitted by vehicles will decrease.
However, this approach is not perfect and has drawbacks. The first and most noticeable disadvantage is social isolation. Zoning residential areas away from commercial and public spaces can reduce opportunities for community interaction, leading to a sense of isolation and weakened social bonds. Subsequently, this can lead to mental health issues, such as emotional disorders.
Another problem that people can face due to this approach is urban sprawl. Strict zoning policies can contribute to urban sprawl as cities expand outward to accommodate separate zones, leading to inefficient land use. Moreover, this can also cause the loss of green spaces, which people need now more than ever.
To conclude, I think that the method of zoning different places into specific areas has more advantages and the potential to develop our cities.
The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas.
- Ensure that your arguments are fully developed in each paragraph.
The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.
The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. There are a few minor errors, but they do not impede communication.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. The arguments are well-developed and supported with relevant examples. However, the conclusion could be more fully developed.
Suggestions
- Try to provide a more comprehensive conclusion that summarizes the key points of your argument.