In some countries, companies allow people to work from home. In others, people are still expected to work in an office. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a debate over from where people should work, with some saying it would be better for individuals to work from their house. However, others agree that employees have to go to their offices. In my point of view, people should go to their workplace, as working there con be good for meetings and when humans work in their offices, they will be with their colleagues.
Working at home has its own advantages and disadvantages. Pros of working from home may provide an opportunity namely saving time. As vast majority of workers are living far from their job. But it also provides drawbacks, one of them is distraction. It can be more distractive than working in workspace, in view of the fact that some of them might have children at home, who are able to create noice a lot. For example, uzbek workers, all of them have their brothers, sisters or babies which they need to take care of them. If they do not have, they have lovely moms to whom they need to help to do home chores.
On the other hand, proponents of working in a place of work firmly believe it is the best way to enhance team working skills as working in the office gives a chance to create a team and work with them. In my opinion, in would be easier to finish some kind of project working with team rather than finishing it alone at home. Moreover, employees who work in an office, can easily organize meetings in their work space. Since, it is a bit strange to invite guests from an another country to their homes, especially women. For instance, many of may have wives who might envy their husbands from their colleagues and it may lead to divorce.
In conclusion, while both perspectives on working at home or going to the office have their merits, I align with the option that people need to be employed in their offices. This is because it provides a lot of opportunities, one of them is concentration. When individuals work in their workplace they can be fully concentrated to their job and responsible as well.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s opinion.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and clearly state your opinion.
The essay uses a variety of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. For example, “it is a bit strange to invite guests from another country to their homes, especially women” could be rephrased for clarity and sensitivity. Additionally, the use of more precise and varied vocabulary could enhance the essay.
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, but there are some grammatical errors and inaccuracies in punctuation and spelling. For example, “Working at home has its own advantages and disadvantages” is a clear and accurate sentence, but “it is a bit strange to invite guests from another country to their homes, especially women” could be rephrased for clarity and sensitivity. Additionally, the use of more precise and varied grammatical structures could enhance the essay.
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay addresses the topic by discussing both views on the issue, but the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The writer’s opinion is clear, but the essay would benefit from more specific examples and a deeper analysis of the implications of each perspective. Additionally, the conclusion could be more comprehensive in summarizing the main points and reinforcing the writer’s stance.
Suggestions
- Include more specific examples to support your arguments.
- Provide a deeper analysis of the implications of each perspective.
- Ensure that the conclusion is comprehensive in summarizing the main points and reinforcing the writer’s stance.