In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying . To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is a perspective that in the near future, paper-based books and printed newspapers will be fully replaced by e-books. Despite the fact that switching to online publications is beneficial in numerous ways, I partially disagree with the given statement since the bookworm community highly values the printed media mainly because of tactile experience.
One of the prime reasons behind this confident prediction is the pursuit of global environmental sustainability. Many argue that the book manufacture may be one of the reasons for air pollution. In other words, the process of production and distribution of the printed product might have a negative environmental impact since it requires cutting down a huge number of trees, resulting in deforestation. Not only that, but also the printing industry contributes to air contamination and ecosystems’ impact because the manufacturing process uses large amounts of water and chemicals. Moreover, in order to protect intellectual property rights, some authors support this statement as it sets a number of challenges to copyright online books. These points can justify why there is such an assumption.
There are a number of disadvantages to the digital resolution, however. Distractions are one of the main arguments against this statement. Shifting from traditional reading processes to technology-driven ones leads to disturbances, mostly because of notifications. Furthermore, this way of consuming information causes in the form of eye strain. Instead, enjoying the traditional reading process prevents health concerns and the reduction of attention span. Moreover, one of the biggest satisfactions of reading books is the physical act of turning pages, resulting in a potential for deeper engagement with text and better information retention.
In my view, it is reasonable to accept both undeniable changes in the reading industry and the disadvantages of such a modification. This balanced opinion can be a wiser choice to experiment with both ways of reading and getting contentment. For instance, I stick to reading paperbound books since it effects to information consumption positively and prevent my eye vision from getting reduced. On the contrary, the continuation of the traditional reading industry harms the environment in many cases, including deforestation and overuse of water and chemicals.
In summary, such a prediction are mainly stated not by those who are over fond of reading books since they do not note the level of effectiveness of engagement just because of tactile experience. On the other hand, it is important to note that digital resolution will assist in solving environmental problems. In my opinion, it is more advantageous to find an excitement in a mix.
The essay is logically organized and the ideas are connected well. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. Clearer topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph and more explicit linking phrases would help guide the reader through the essay. Ensuring consistent punctuation and spacing will also improve readability.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
- Make sure that your conclusion effectively summarizes the main points of your essay.
The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, but there are instances of awkward phrasing and incorrect word choices. For example, “the bookworm community highly values the printed media mainly because of tactile experience” could be rephrased as “book lovers highly value the tactile experience of printed media.” Improving lexical precision and variety will enhance the clarity and professionalism of the essay. Additionally, ensuring correct spelling and grammar usage will improve overall readability.
The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few instances of incorrect or awkward grammar. The essay contains several grammatical errors that affect clarity and readability. These include issues with punctuation, subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure. For example, “In summary, such a prediction are mainly stated not by those who are over fond of reading books” should be “In summary, such a prediction is mainly stated by those who are not overly fond of reading books.” Paying closer attention to grammatical accuracy, including correct verb forms and preposition usage, will improve the overall quality of the essay.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the potential replacement of printed books and newspapers by e-books and digital media. The writer presents a clear stance, acknowledging the benefits of digital media while also appreciating the value of printed books for certain audiences, such as the bookworm community. The argument is well-developed and supported with relevant points, but the essay could benefit from more specific examples and a clearer structure in the conclusion to reinforce the main points. The conclusion could be more impactful by summarizing the key arguments and reiterating the writer’s stance more forcefully.
Suggestions
- Try to develop your arguments more fully and support them with specific examples.
- Make sure that each paragraph has a clear main idea and that all sentences in the paragraph support that idea.