International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?

It is believed that international tourism had large numbers of benefits globally, as well as there is a suggestion about influence on local people and the environment. An increasing waste and pollution may damage fragile ecosystems, while I believe that the advantages in economic and social terms outweigh disadvantages.
Living in a country where tourists increase noise and traffic pollution has a huge impact on disrupting our environment. A good example is numerous family visitors of historical and romantic countries like the USA, France, and Uzbekistan rent cars for traveling to attractive highlights, which is not only a reason for rising traffic congestion but also growing numbers of patients and elderly people who can suffer from the loud noises emitted by these vehicles. Another issue with sustainable tourism from growth is mismanaged waste. This is because tourists take with them various snacks, like chips and sparkling drinks, and after eating or drinking them, they throw away packaging that can be a cause of waste pollution.
On the other hand, tourism has positive effects on society and economic growth of that country. For example, day by day, for those that can afford to travel, visiting other places provides an opportunity not only for tourists to meet new people and even become long-term friends but also involves jobs and income for millions of people, which declines the proportion of poverty. Moreover, the money earned from tourism can be invested in conservation. For instance, cutting-edge buildings and roads will be built, and this will benefit locals, leading to higher standards of living.
In conclusion, the tourism industry brought significant drawbacks to many countries; despite this, I strongly believe that pros like improvements in public facilities and setting friendships can be key reasons for ignoring different problems.

7.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.

Suggestions

Use more linking words to improve the flow of ideas.
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central topic.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary relevant to the topic, such as “fragile ecosystems,” “traffic pollution,” and “economic growth.” However, there are some instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that detract from the overall clarity and effectiveness of the writing. Additionally, the use of more varied and precise language could help to strengthen the argument.

The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, which helps to maintain reader interest. However, there are some grammatical errors that can cause confusion, such as issues with subject-verb agreement and preposition use. Proofreading the essay to correct these errors is recommended. Additionally, the use of more varied and complex sentence structures could help to strengthen the argument and make the writing more engaging.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing both the benefits and drawbacks of international tourism and expressing a clear opinion that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. The writer presents relevant examples to support their points but could further develop the argument with more specific evidence or data. Additionally, the conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.