It is a natural process for animal specicies to become extinct (e.g dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The is a notion that the extinction of animal species is an inevatable process of the nature, and humans should not try to save those endangered species. While there is some truth to this statement, I tend to disagree.
Natural cycle of the planet changes over time and experiences different periods, such as Ice Ages or the Fall of Asteroids to the planet. These events might be a reason why we needn’t try to stop the extinction of animals because they are considered to be natural and cannot be avoided. Many different creatures that walked on the planet in the past have gone extinct and some new animals have replaced their place now. Humanity does not have to partake in this process as it happens naturally.
However, I believe people should take actions to stop this. Environment consists of many types of flora and fauna, both of which keep the nature as it is. If some animal species disappear, it might dusrupt many natural processes. For example, food chain may get affected badly since every single animal, regardless of their size, number or type, has its own unique place in the food chain. This, in turn, can bring about many other environmental problems.
Furthermore, it is just unethical to simply let other creatures die out. Humanity shares the planet with the nature, which means both humans and animals have equal rights to live on it. Since animals help us by producing food and helping in the field, as they did in the past, people now should be taking measures to save the lives of animal species which are in the edge of going extinct because it is our moral responsibilty as the leading species of the planet.
In conclusion, while the disappearance of animal species might seem natural, I argue that humanity must try to prevent this as it can have a negative effect on the nature as a whole and doing so would be morally right.

7.0

The essay is logically organized and the ideas are connected well. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.

Suggestions

Use more linking words to improve the flow of ideas.
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central topic.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary relevant to the topic. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity. Additionally, the use of more specific examples could enhance the argument.

The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures and is generally grammatically accurate. However, there are a few minor errors that could be corrected for clarity. Additionally, the use of more specific examples could enhance the argument.

The essay addresses the task effectively and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay effectively addresses the prompt by presenting a clear argument that humans should take action to prevent the extinction of animal species. The writer provides a well-developed argument with clear supporting points, but could benefit from more specific examples to illustrate their points more effectively.