It is thought by some that it is better to live in a city, while others believe that life is better in the countryside. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Some people believe that dwelling in an urban area is good, while others think that it’s better to stay in hinterland. I am more attracted to the idea of living in the city because of medical services and education.
To begin with, living in an urban area is more preferable for a few reasons. One of them is accessible healthcare services. Many hospitals are located in city centers, where individuals can reach by subway or bus, without any obstacles. For example, for elderly people would be difficult to get to the hospital, if they lived in the countryside, because it takes longer hours to reach their destination, as some hospitals located far away from homes. This would lower their quality of life and can negatively impact on their health. Another reason why it is better to inhabit in cities is learning. Individuals struggle with finding professional teachers in the countryside, because of a lack of tutors. For instance, there is an excellent access to learning centers, as they are located nearby. Thus, searching for educational centers saves time.
On the other hand, rural benefits that people can gain living there should also not be undermined. One of them is less pollution. In the city centers various of skyscrapers are built, which is harmful for environment and nature. As a result, individuals face with traffic congestion due to constructions and narrow streets. Therefore, countryside is less polluted and people do not experience inconveniences. Moreover, dwellers in rural areas are healthy and have better immune system. As an example, people intake more organic food, because In rural areas, people harvest crops at home and take care of them. They also raise their own livestock, such as cows, for meat instead of buying it from supermarkets. Hence, the low likelihood that people will develop various diseases.
To sum up, some people argue that it is beneficial to live in the countryside, because of health life. Nevertheless, I prefer to live in city, where is more helpful and useful for human being.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the progression of ideas a bit difficult to follow. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s opinion.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and clearly state your opinion.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire, with a variety of vocabulary and some use of less common terms. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and a variety of grammatical structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions that can be distracting. The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and a variety of grammatical structures with some errors. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions that can be distracting. These errors do not significantly impact the overall clarity or readability of the essay.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The writer discusses the advantages of both urban and rural living environments and clearly states their preference for urban living due to the accessibility of medical services and education. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples to support the arguments and by offering a more detailed exploration of the counter-argument.