Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think having a younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree?

It is not uncommon to see the head of an organization to be mostly older people, but a younger leader is believed to be the way better than elderly. Although there are some valid advantages of having a young head, but I think an old one is more suitable for this position.
A young leader is more likely to have fresh ideas and modern skills, which can foster to new innovations in a team or an organization. There are numerous discoveries having been done almost in all fields in the past decades, and it is easier for young minds to handle new openings which are still kept happening, as because mostly they tend to be risk-taking. As a result, a combination of all qualities may be beneficial to achieve a success, but in some life cases they are lack of experience, which is very crucial to have for skilled CEO. Consequently, this can damage overall performance at work and lead sometimes to failure.
Meanwhile, I believe that elderly CEOs mostly associated with wisdom in their job. Most successful and huge companies, such as KFC and McDonald’s, were created by people over 50 years old. This is because older people are likely to have profound vision about jobs which they are busy with. In a fact, they are much more skilled, and even though they do not more often take risks compared to younger ones, and if they do it, their steps are taken thoughtfully and actions are well-planned, which is less likely to ruin the corporation. Additionally, they are very good at managing staff and distributing the tasks among them by their skills and strengths, as they need to show confidence as well as competence in order to win the respect of their personnel. Thus, having an experienced leader is likely to be useful and brings to an organization a success and prosperity.
In conclusion, while young leaders bring energy and innovation to a corporation, older leaders are better suited for leadership roles due to their experience and strategic thinking. These qualities are crucial for ensuring an organization’s growth and sustainability over time.

7.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.

Suggestions

Use more linking words to improve the flow of ideas.
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central topic.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary relevant to the topic. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity. Additionally, the use of more specific examples could enhance the argument.

The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect sentence construction. The essay demonstrates a good command of complex sentence structures and a variety of grammatical forms. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect sentence construction that could be revised for clarity. Additionally, the use of more specific examples could enhance the argument.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the advantages of both younger and older leaders and clearly stating the writer’s preference for older leaders. The argument is well-developed and supported with relevant points, but the essay could benefit from more specific examples to illustrate the arguments more effectively. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.