Many people believe that online education will replace traditional classroom learning in the future. To what extent do you agree or disagree
There is a view that education system should replace online education with traditional classroom learning in the future I completely disagree with this proposal as such the new method isn’t to use it enough doesn’t give a sense of competition and the old method more suitable for everyone and encouraging them.
Despite online education has its own unique advantages, it can’t give the same level of effect as a traditional teaching way. If we Face to the history, the traditional teaching methods was developed and refined long ago. For instance, by traditional classroom teaching way in history many great scholars appeared, which means that the method that has been used for a long time is relatively better.
Considering that one of the necessary factors in the study process is competition. Competition in traditional way is better than online education. The main reason of that is face to face competition provide more sense than from behind the screen.
Otherwise, online education sometimes may encourage students to cheating, while they struggling with competition, such as using artificial intelligence or network.
treasure more considering the financial situation of some students, traditional teaching way is better for students who don’t have computer or laptop. For example, in some countries, students who live in poor and hard environments are more effective than others. The particular reason for a circumstance is the poor situation encourage them.In this case, with traditional way students will be more motivated.
In conclusion, online education isn’t tried very well, doesn’t give sense of competition ,can lead to cheating furthermore traditional teaching way can more motivate students.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the stance on the issue.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and reiterate your stance on the issue.
The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical resource. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with appropriate use of academic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and precision.
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are only minor errors. However, there are some issues with sentence structure and grammatical agreement that can be distracting. The essay demonstrates a good command of grammar, with a variety of sentence structures used effectively. However, there are a few minor errors that could be revised for clarity and precision.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay effectively addresses the prompt, providing a clear position and supporting it with relevant examples. However, the argument could be more fully developed, with more specific examples and a clearer structure in the body paragraphs.
Suggestions
- Ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence and is fully developed with specific examples.