Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Scientific groundwork is a vital component of modern society as the experiment continues to advance and play an increasingly important role in our lives. It has been argued that scientific inquisition should be conducted and regulated by the ministry entities and not by private enterprises. I completely agree with the statement because the government represents the public interest and is accountable to society.
To commence with, the government are seen as representing the public interest, whereas private companies are driven by profit motives. This means that governments are more likely to prioritize inquisition that benefits society as a whole. For example, authority-funded experiments have led to numerous breakthroughs in medical investigation, including the development of vaccines and treatments for diseases such as cancer and HIV.
Another reason is that the ministries are accountable to the public and are subject to transparency and oversight mechanisms on how the research work is ongoing.Therefore, the public will know everything about the groundwork and there will be no unethical practices, such as suppression of investigation findings and the public can have an ethical standards outcome no hiding from the public about the experiment .For instance, IRBs are responsible for reviewing exploration proposals to ensure that they meet ethical standards and protect human subjects.
In conclusion, I totally agree with the statement that authority should be controlled over the scientific investigation because its oversight ensures groundwork aligns with public interest and accountability and the community will know everything about the experiment and whether it is good for them or not it will ensure their safety.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the author’s stance.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to link all the ideas in a paragraph to the main point of the paragraph.
The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical resource, with a variety of vocabulary and some use of formal language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and accuracy. Additionally, the use of synonyms could be increased to avoid repetition and enhance the lexical resource.
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there is a good range of structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions that can be distracting. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, which adds to the overall quality of the writing. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions that could be revised for clarity and accuracy. Additionally, the use of punctuation could be improved to enhance the clarity and flow of the writing.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The essay effectively addresses the prompt by clearly stating the author’s position and providing relevant supporting arguments. The essay also provides a clear introduction and conclusion, effectively framing the response. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples to support the arguments and by ensuring that the conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and reiterates the author’s stance.
Suggestions
- Provide more specific examples to support your arguments.
- Ensure that the conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and reiterates the author’s stance.