Skip to main content

Many people believe that using a bicycle as main form of transport has a lot of advantages whereas others think that it has many disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

We are now living in a world of unprecedented technological revolution; the use of bicycles as a primary means of transportation in modern society has sparked considerable debate, with some saying that it has many benefits, while others argue that it has numerous drawbacks. While it can sometimes be beneficial, I side with those who strongly oppose this idea.
Admittedly, many people can greatly benefit from utilizing a bike as the chief form of mobility. The first one relates to physical health. If people cycle regularly, they enhance their muscle tone and endurance, which boosts immune systems and helps them maintain a healthy weight. This, potentially, reduces the risk of obesity-related diseases like metabolic syndrome, coronary artery disease, and chronic arterial hypertension. Another key benefit is that choosing a bicycle as the predominant mode of transport is environmentally friendly. In other words, bicycles produce no emissions, such as CO₂, NOₓ, or fine particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), unlike motorized transport. This makes them effective, particularly in combating air pollution and mitigating climate change—pressing concerns on a global scale.
Despite these benefits described above, I firmly believe that the potential drawbacks bear greater weight. When individuals are not educated about road safety, they are more likely to engage in risky behavior, which increases the chances of accidents. Consequently, they might suffer from serious injuries such as bone fractures, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and spinal cord lesions or vertebral fractures with potential cord damage, thereby causing a decline in the number of people willing to cycle regularly. A good case in point is my home country of Uzbekistan, where a lack of public awareness about road safety, inadequate cycling infrastructure, and road rage have led to an upsurge in accidents involving cyclists.
In conclusion, although I acknowledge the arguments in favor of relying on a bicycle as the primary mode of transportation, especially in terms of physical well-being and low environmental impact, I remain convinced that they still pale in comparison to the major downsides, such as escalation in accident rates and decreased inclination to cycle.

8.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.

Suggestions
  • Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas.
  • Ensure that your arguments are fully developed and explained.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.

The essay shows a good control of a range of grammatical structures, with only minor errors. However, there are a few sentences that could be rephrased for clarity.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. Both sides of the argument are discussed in a balanced way, and the writer’s opinion is clearly stated. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples to support the arguments.

Suggestions
  • Try to include more specific examples to support your arguments.
  • Ensure that each paragraph focuses on a single main idea.